Message from @IXI
Discord ID: 682021023763136582
Evidently, that's a false statement.
But you refer to Ad Hominems more than you do to science, so for that, have fun.
Ok then explaim how modern medicine solved the problem of spanish flu or small pox
Feel free to continue talking, but if anyone else has questions and actually would like to learn about it, feel free to let me know.
LOL what a clown
Unfortunately, that's a mirror.
Literally 0 proof for anything you said and the reason is " i wont be convinced "
So hey let me make a bunch of false statements say its a fact but provide no evidence because no one will change their minds
Sounds very smart
this isn't the first time he makes a baseless claim then refuses to defend it because "you won't accept it"
Well, if you'd like to know the *specific* reason, Variolation played a huge part initially in preventing the spread of those diseases, the former specifically.
This of course was expensive, invasive, and not very efficient, so a replacement was necessary.
As for Syphilis, you can still get it but things that helped prevent the transmission of STDs like *woah, condoms* and similar developments dramatically decreased the proliferation of syphilis.
Its easily debunked by the simple fact less than 10 percent of the people vaccinated for it
Completely disproves all what you say
Against Syphilis?
I think you'll realize what I said is valid if you consider the differences between vaccination and condoms.
Im talking about variolation
So you're saying that less then 10% of the population are vaccinated for variolation?
Or something else?
So the vaccine didnt eradicate it
Well, that's quite telling.
So, to verify again, 10% of the world population is vaccinated against variolation?
Where do you get a vaccine for it?
The Doctor's?
Variolation is not a disease
Its small pox
Here, this is for Cholera.
No, it isn't.
And yet...
You argued that 10% of the world population was vaccinated for variolation.
Variolation or inoculation was the method first used to immunize an individual against smallpox (Variola) with material taken from a patient or a recently variolatedindividual, in the hope that a mild, but protective, infection would result
You use variolation as if its a disease
I was using your terminology, as you clearly believed it was.
Until you looked it up
No
And made the sudden realization
That it wasn't a disease.
I literally quoted you