We no longer have the time to explain everything to you as if you're a child. We have compilations of research made for people like you. Either dig in and be redpilled, or argue more and be bluepilled. Either way stop wasting our time.
lukethiel.com
tinyurl.com/truthfolder
pastebin.com/JEgNBSBi

you have a website?

sick

That Shahzwar Bugti video is laughable. Obviously has no knowledge of the thing they're trying to debunk.

I gotta agree with you there, Pit. I thought it was a parody at first.

If you told me it was, i'd believe you

Also, @Logrian if you run those numbers in the refraction equation you find those conditions are on the extreme end for refraction. I.e. those conditions are ideal for viewing the distant rig.

Okay i have a question
I've heard it stated a while ago that the flat earth is constantly accelerating upwards, and that's why things fall. Does anyone even believe that now?

That's their main theory

Problem with that is you'll have accelerated to light speed within a year

What

<:kirbo:677658524289073152>

It's a constant

9.8m/s

Constant acceleration

9.81 m/s /s

So you acccelerate 9.81 m/s per second

Ah I see, I interpreteded the way it would work in a flat Earth wrong

I thought the earth just moved up with the speed of 9.8m/s, but that would mean objects wouldn't accelerate when falling down, my bad

Ah yeah, I can see the confusion

So that just makes their model more confusing

If it was a constant speed, then there would be no force

They can't seem to accept to be on a globe that's rotating very fast, but they accept being on a flat disk accelerating endlessly

Apparently

and, indeed, faster than light speed

True

<:confused:625494374402228244>

Even using the creationist age of the Earth that's still 6-8 thousand times faster than light speed

Never thought of that

<:smart:484956754489376781>

Or in other words "1000 mph spin is far too fast and unreasonable! Much more realistic to just be travelling upwards at 5000000000000 mph!"

Lmao, I see the logic

Also, another thing I've thought of, they say things seem to disappear the farther away they go due to perspective, but what if you have a helicopter far away that you can clearly see. It's not moving towards you or away from you, but it's landing and it disappears behind the horizon

I don't think that explanation of perspective would work

<:goose:625498032036642847>

Sci-Fi...Gone in 60 seconds 🕵
https://youtu.be/oGuEMG5Cnyw

1) Debunked many times. Just beacause you state you're 'taking into account other effects' does not mean you have.
2) Refraction over water.
3) Out of focus.

Does the video imply the moon emits it's own light?

I'm confused

Does anyone else believe that the world is a decagon? It makes sense when you think about it also hi guys i'm new here