It shouldn't be entirely isolationist, but definitely not imperialist.

it should be whatever the damn historical situation demands

it's retarded to argue about how a country should be without taking into consideration what kind of situation it finds itself in

Imperialism is better than isolation

If you don't have the sufficient economic resources, industry and military organization and effevtiveness, (just like Italy during ww2), it is better to stay as a isolationist autarchy during a period of chaos (like Spain did), than to go into a "Blaze of Glory" with the probabilty of being completely destroyed (like Imperial Russia).

Isolationist cause it would be easier to justify rn plus what if the colonists decide to mate with the brownies, now you have a population problem

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

**-** What is your view on the best way to solve poverty? Elaborate on specifics

free money

How do I become the greatest US Navy SEAL of all time?

@honey Murder all poor people

You can’t have poor people if people don’t exist

just print a lot of money and give it to @everyone

😦

kys @poor

@kwit_dat_Stalin Bright eyed observation.

So be it.

Kill all poor people!

we need poor people

so when they die off

survival of the fittest

no overpopulation

Overpopulation won't be much of a problem.

ehhhh

Or we kill all poor peopke

make camps

<:smug:591181720565579807>

No

Just shoot them

Target practice for the army

dude

waste of bullets

poor homes?
most government programs don't seem to work
the main issue is I think migrants applying for gibs.

germany tried that with the jews

waste of bullets

Not if we make it into exercise

why waste money when you can do a simpler method

Why waste money on gas when you can train your army

also

is doctor anon a communist?

hmm