Message from @!?_Quantum_Physics

Discord ID: 690002036477132815


2020-03-19 00:56:56 UTC  

Rome fell in 476 AD shortly after.

2020-03-19 00:57:03 UTC  

The east on the other hand was fine.

2020-03-19 00:57:24 UTC  

Leo I The Thracian and Marcian handled the Huns and barbarians well

2020-03-19 00:57:40 UTC  

Then came along a homie named Zeno in 476

2020-03-19 00:57:59 UTC  

His own brother in law convinced him that his life was in danger and nicked the throne while he was gone.

2020-03-19 00:58:16 UTC  

Basiliscus was killed in 477 in Cappadocia.

2020-03-19 00:58:26 UTC  

Zeno promised to not shed his blood so he left him and his family to die in a cistern.

2020-03-19 00:58:40 UTC  

Zeno ruled until his death in 491?

2020-03-19 00:58:57 UTC  

All was ok; an old emperor came to throne; Anastasius I Dicorus

2020-03-19 00:59:17 UTC  

Anastasius completely filled up the NOW Byzantine treasury

2020-03-19 00:59:24 UTC  

His time came by; and for his successor Justin I

2020-03-19 00:59:31 UTC  

Then came Justinian I

2020-03-19 00:59:46 UTC  

People see him as great; and yeah; sure.

2020-03-19 00:59:51 UTC  

He conquered territory

2020-03-19 01:00:01 UTC  

But he let the Nika Riots go by and drained the treasury

2020-03-19 01:00:12 UTC  

Not amazing, but he was a good emperor overall

2020-03-19 01:00:24 UTC  

His successor Justin II his nephew was a bit insane.

2020-03-19 01:00:39 UTC  

Died after a short reign

2020-03-19 01:00:55 UTC  

His successors were fine souls; coming up to a lad named Maurice

2020-03-19 01:01:29 UTC  

Maurice was on the danube frontier in 602 when a Centurion named Phokas overthrew him and executed him

2020-03-19 01:01:45 UTC  

People say phokas was miserably terrible, but I’ll explain later

2020-03-19 01:02:16 UTC  

Phokas had a lot to deal with since the Sassanid emperor named Khosrau declared war on the Byzantine empire, and there were Slavs in the west.

2020-03-19 01:02:43 UTC  

Phokas was quite unpopular, but he ended up doing OK. Sort of better than his successor

2020-03-19 01:02:55 UTC  

Heraclius was the next in line who had him killed in 608.

2020-03-19 01:03:08 UTC  

maurice from king julien

2020-03-19 01:03:17 UTC  

Heraclius held off the Sassanids pretty well for 30 years until trouble brewed in the Levant

2020-03-19 01:03:27 UTC  

Something happened in 632 AD, anyone know what?

2020-03-19 01:03:39 UTC  

Muslim

2020-03-19 01:03:44 UTC  

AllahuAkbarman died

2020-03-19 01:03:49 UTC  

Aka Muhammad

2020-03-19 01:04:07 UTC  

So; Moslems began erupting

2020-03-19 01:04:15 UTC  

The sassanids and byzantines went to fight them

2020-03-19 01:04:25 UTC  

In 636, at the mouth of the Yarmouk river

2020-03-19 01:04:40 UTC  

The Arabs completely smashed an army that outnumbered them

2020-03-19 01:04:59 UTC  

Heraclius was broken, and he died years later. Poor soul, all he worked for was destroyed

2020-03-19 01:05:15 UTC  

His successor did his best to hold off the Arabs and did perfectly fine.

2020-03-19 01:05:35 UTC  

Constans II Pogonatos became unpopular towards the end of his reign in 668.

2020-03-19 01:05:45 UTC  

He was killed in his own tub by his chamberlain with a bucket.

2020-03-19 01:05:47 UTC  

Whoops!

2020-03-19 01:05:49 UTC  

Lol of course you would be here troll

2020-03-19 01:06:03 UTC  

Coming around to uhh