Message from @!?_Quantum_Physics

Discord ID: 690006676535115852


2020-03-19 01:12:37 UTC  

Everything was pretty fine; till Michael III the drunkard came in

2020-03-19 01:12:48 UTC  

People call him the drunkard because he was lazy and ineffective

2020-03-19 01:12:59 UTC  

He was actually pretty good contrary to what was branded upon him

2020-03-19 01:13:07 UTC  

The byzantine made a lot of territorial gains

2020-03-19 01:13:33 UTC  

Overall, approaching the 9th century the byzantine empire was faring off pretty well.

2020-03-19 01:14:21 UTC  

Basil I the Macedonian ruled until 886? AD after him.

2020-03-19 01:14:33 UTC  

Basil was good. Great financial administrator and conqueroror

2020-03-19 01:14:51 UTC  

Died in a hunting accident after getting dragged by a deer for 16 KM.

2020-03-19 01:15:22 UTC  

The empire was fine for many years after basil died under Constantine VII Porphyrogenitos and Romanos Lekapenos

2020-03-19 01:15:29 UTC  

Enter 960.

2020-03-19 01:16:07 UTC  

The empire’s all fine and dandy, but Romanos’ successor Romanos II is ineffective.

2020-03-19 01:16:45 UTC  

When he dies, a lad named Nikephoros II pinches the throne

2020-03-19 01:16:59 UTC  

Nikephoros was an ugly person, but one of the best military conquerors.

2020-03-19 01:17:22 UTC  

He was eventually killed after a 6 year reign after a conspiracy from a minister that he demoted for ineffectivity

2020-03-19 01:17:49 UTC  

His successor John Tzismiskes was great too, excellent conqueror until his untimely death in 976 from the plague

2020-03-19 01:18:08 UTC  

Then came the best Byzantine emperor

2020-03-19 01:18:15 UTC  

Basil II Boulgaroktonos.

2020-03-19 01:18:46 UTC  

Basil expanded the Empire’s territories all the way to the danube and was a brilliant financial admin. All was great at that time.

2020-03-19 01:19:12 UTC  

His successors were poorly chosen men who were husbands of the Empress Zoe, except for Constantine Monomachos who was fairly good

2020-03-19 01:20:07 UTC  

Then a bloke came along by 1060~ named Constantine X Doulas

2020-03-19 01:20:11 UTC  

Doukas

2020-03-19 01:20:27 UTC  

What about the Great Schism?

2020-03-19 01:20:37 UTC  

Doukas was pathetic, destroyed the army, and economy

2020-03-19 01:20:40 UTC  

Oh the schism?

2020-03-19 01:20:44 UTC  

I’ll get into that later

2020-03-19 01:21:18 UTC  

His successor Romanos IV diogenes suffered a horrible defeat at Manzikert in 1071 to the turks and all was in shambles since he was taken captive

2020-03-19 01:21:50 UTC  

His successors weren’t great either until a certain fellow named Alexios I Komnenos came along

2020-03-19 01:22:06 UTC  

Until 1185 the Komnenids were good and competent rulers who held the empire upright

2020-03-19 01:22:33 UTC  

Alexios John and Manuel were all good and well meaning.

2020-03-19 01:22:43 UTC  

Manuel too, except in 1176 towards the end of his reign

2020-03-19 01:22:54 UTC  

He suffered a defeat to the turks at Myriokephalon.

2020-03-19 01:23:12 UTC  

Whoops! And in the early 1180s when he died, his successor was his 14 year old son.

2020-03-19 01:23:36 UTC  

John’s cousin Andronikos I Komnenos had the youth strangled and took reign

2020-03-19 01:23:52 UTC  

Andronikos was cruel.

2020-03-19 01:24:07 UTC  

He was eventually killed after a week of public torture

2020-03-19 01:24:24 UTC  

Coming around the late 12th century we see the most spineless rulers

2020-03-19 01:24:29 UTC  

The Angelids.

2020-03-19 01:24:44 UTC  

Isaac II Angelos was a pathetic ruler who did almost nothing

2020-03-19 01:25:17 UTC  

His relative Alexios III Angelos wasn’t better at all. Cruel and lavish, he emptied the treasury on personal items and dismantled the army

2020-03-19 01:25:24 UTC  

The issue here was the crusaders

2020-03-19 01:25:50 UTC  

Alexios was expelled by the crusaders and Isaac’s son Alexios IV Angelos was put into power