Message from @Zach
Discord ID: 676793767784611870
If its reason then provide a deductive argument
Instead of acting like its assumed
inb4 we would be extinct if we didnt do that
I can say gathering sticks on the Sabbath does not cause an offense to anyone. So it would not justify stoning a man to death. Morality based on reason like what the founding fathers asserted
Why should "offense" be the standard which transfers an action from an amoral one, to an immoral/moral one?
lol
Don't remember saying a joke, answer the question
Is this Humes is vs ought?
Hell femoids
No?
I never even indicated that its the is/ought lol
I'm asking why should that be the standard which makes something moral/immoral
Reason
<:ben:588490784576110593>
I have answered you
What reason
What reason concludes that offense is the standard which makes something moral/immoral
Present it
Who gave you that reason??
didnt this start as le state should be the church debate
Literally irrelevant lmao
I have a shrine to the governer of Massachusetts in my workspace
reason is defined as adequate correspondence between premises and conclusions in philosophy, what does the origin of reason have anything to do with your reason concluding that offense is a standard by which we should judge actions?
Turkey also had a secular constitution
???
What the fuck are you going on about
Yeah i think they're trolling
Trolling isn't allowed in serious chats, so cut it off
Now ad hominem
LOOL
You guys are not too bright
Anyway you're boring later
Adhom is insulting instead of acknowledging arguments, you made no arguments
I asked you for an argument
`Turkey also had a secular constitution` how are we supposed to respond to this besides mockery
You just ignored me because you realized you're wrong
lol this @Ater Votum
your average 14 year old atheist everybody
You started the insults, called me a troll later
When did i insult you instead of acknowledging the argument?