No company would want to exist in that hellhole

Except you're wrong

war-time germany

I said want. Being coerced with force is not free choice

And even if they didnt, social polarization would lead to a point where it's either that or the communists completley cease all private property and industry

Who cares about what they want?

Markets.

I dont care.

The intrestss of the state and people come first.

a culture is influenced by things such as politics and economics as well as history, if your from lets say the USSR in the 1950 you have the history of being a socialist revolutionary, but if you reject socialist doctrine and you reject there economics and culture that is dialectical and historical materialism you are not really part of that culture are you
Everything that makes up a culture is subject to change
EVERYTHING
I mean the west used to be pagan, and I think it is fair at this point to say it used to be christian, all of which caused MASSIVELY different cultures
by default since a culture is subject to change
and a culture can change because people in the culture change, this means peopel alter culture and change how they think and thus people can adopt different cultures.

@Maksim

How do you respond?

@Chief Rocket Designer Yea and?

Not caring is not an argument. Besides, you just basically laid the foundation for an authoritarian system, not whatever culture is, so it has no relevancy to the actual discussion

if you accept what i say you can't be an ethno-nationalist

@Clincoin Yes it is.

@Chief Rocket Designer Wrong

Say in one sentence how it has relevancy

@Maksim why ```and thus people can adopt different cultures.``` This means culture is not tied to race

@Clincoin Because since i dont care, that ends the argument about care of the markets -the market's input on the matter is irrelevant.

So you negate the entire discussion because you say you don't care. Then why pose it in the first place

@Chief Rocket Designer No, its the same culture and people that change in of themselves

waste of my time smh

@Clincoin I said I dont care about the Market's input

Of what they want

Not caring is not an argument. Besides, you just basically laid the foundation for an authoritarian system, not whatever culture is, so it has no relevancy to the actual discussion
Say in one sentence how it has relevancy

Who said it isnt?

https://discordapp.com/channels/587015719141507090/587028275918929925/662481169551720482
This is where the discussion is at

Now prove that concept is feasible, how would it work.

@Maksim where is my logic wrong

@Chief Rocket Designer Where is your logic correct

I mean

I am making a case I view as logical

I dont view it as logical

and substanitated by basic history

Gonna need a source

I am asking where it went wrong

I gave one

Free Markets, even those limited to national borders (which then isnt a free market, but thats besides the point) will not pay regard to moral code

The change of europe from pagan triablism to statist paganism to statist christianist to statist secularism

@Maksim It's a statement, it assumes it is feasible. If people claim ownership or limitations then sure, it is doable <a:shruganimated:421995622346784768>

@Clincoin I dont assume its feasible

@Chief Rocket Designer What does that have to do with anything?