Then drop it.

And how do you expect me to have evidence that you banned me because i destroyed you, why would i screenshot my argument with you prior to getting banned? When i got banned i couldn't have collected evidence since i was banned

No

@Clincoin Capitalism being free-markets and consumerism.

Nationalism being the preservation and valuation of one's culture and moral code.

What type of free market, do you mean absolute free markets or with anti-monopoly action?
Also, what do you define as culture under nationalism? morals i get, but culture is very vague.

Either.
Culture is an irrational concept, one simply knows it can it usually cannot be quantified. One knows if he is in or out of it.

Why can't it be quantified

I just explained

well do it again

No

just ctrl-v

You can have free markets without allowing international markets to have influence in theory, so i'd say they can with workarounds definetely be compatible

But if you have free markets with outside influences then surely no

I'd figure either evaluated capitalism or mixed economics.

Classic Fascist

yes.

@Clincoin It's not just international markets

Well if markets influence culture, that which we cannot know what is, then we cannot discuss it

too little knowledge

Free Markets mean corporations will always attempt to make as much money as possible

Not necessarily, again, workarounds can exist

A free market can exist without the free exploitation of resources

This means they will inevitably drift towards consumerism, greed, unethical marketing, etc

Can you show me a real example of one?

Which has been tested by time?

don't have to, i said they can exist.

Im talking realistically

me too <a:shruganimated:421995622346784768> , a lack of imagination or insight is not an argument

Here let me copy paste my economic policy so you understand where im coming from

i've laid out the concept

Ah shit i dont have it, hol up let me write it.

In summary, private industry is allowed to exist but if they in any way act against the intrests of the state or betray the people (price hike, artificially limiting supply, unethical marketing tactic, promoting moral degeneracy, poor working conditions, not keeping wages up with inflation and buying power, etc etc) then the CEOs are executed and the company nationalized.

No company would want to exist in that hellhole

Except you're wrong

war-time germany

I said want. Being coerced with force is not free choice

And even if they didnt, social polarization would lead to a point where it's either that or the communists completley cease all private property and industry

Who cares about what they want?

Markets.

I dont care.

The intrestss of the state and people come first.