Message from @Hitler Shekelsallgone

Discord ID: 310992209195302914


2017-05-08 04:08:55 UTC  

stop spamming bullshit please

2017-05-08 04:08:58 UTC  

Killing is so wrong to most people yet we talk about killing niggers and jews because we just genuinely enjoy it

2017-05-08 04:09:02 UTC  

a man can not be immoral in the woods all alone can he? @jm

2017-05-08 04:09:23 UTC  

is there a way in which he could be immoral?

2017-05-08 04:09:39 UTC  

i would gas the shit out of all involved

2017-05-08 04:09:43 UTC  

if a tree falls in the woods and no one hears it, it still makes a noise

2017-05-08 04:09:59 UTC  

so you are saying that he can be immoral alone?

2017-05-08 04:10:11 UTC  

But how would we know?

2017-05-08 04:10:16 UTC  

can he be moral alone

2017-05-08 04:10:16 UTC  

we wouldn't

2017-05-08 04:10:22 UTC  

@jm prove that the tree makes a noise

2017-05-08 04:10:24 UTC  

no he can't

2017-05-08 04:10:35 UTC  

morality is the reaction by outsiders

2017-05-08 04:10:45 UTC  

so your argument is irrelevant to the conversation

2017-05-08 04:10:50 UTC  

no it isn't

2017-05-08 04:11:03 UTC  

why is it not

2017-05-08 04:11:19 UTC  

i am saying that morality is determined by the reaction to an action by others

2017-05-08 04:11:43 UTC  

just establishing something

2017-05-08 04:11:47 UTC  

morality and immorality therefor don't exist without the reaction of others

2017-05-08 04:11:53 UTC  

correct

2017-05-08 04:12:00 UTC  

do you agree?

2017-05-08 04:12:00 UTC  

what's your point

2017-05-08 04:12:32 UTC  

if a man buys a turkey at walmart, fucks it, cums in it, and then proceeds to eat it. is this immoral?

2017-05-08 04:12:40 UTC  

subjective

2017-05-08 04:12:40 UTC  

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMKKMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

2017-05-08 04:13:13 UTC  

you aren't making an argument for any case, I don't get what your trying to grasp or prove

2017-05-08 04:13:36 UTC  

the point that i am making is that what we decide as moral is socetal norms combined with objective societal good

2017-05-08 04:14:06 UTC  

you have made no point for objectiveness whatsoever?

2017-05-08 04:14:12 UTC  

i just did

2017-05-08 04:14:33 UTC  

in what sense

2017-05-08 04:14:38 UTC  

in all senses

2017-05-08 04:14:46 UTC  

nonargument

2017-05-08 04:15:39 UTC  

OK, just to clarify your argument is that morality has no basis in reality, and is entirely subjective

2017-05-08 04:15:39 UTC  

M[MPK

2017-05-08 04:15:46 UTC  

correct

2017-05-08 04:15:47 UTC  

;;;

2017-05-08 04:15:54 UTC  

nigger nigger nigger niggerr nigger r nigger nigger niggerr niggerr nigger nigger niggerr niggerr nigger nigger niggerr niggerr nigger nigger niggerr niggerr nigger nigger niggerr niggerr nigger nigger niggerr niggerr nigger nigger niggerr niggerr nigger nigger niggerr nigger

2017-05-08 04:15:59 UTC  

LLLL

2017-05-08 04:16:00 UTC  

a man could destroy the world and there would be no immorality in that?

2017-05-08 04:16:04 UTC  

LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

2017-05-08 04:16:21 UTC  

nigger nigger nigger niggerr nigger r nigger nigger niggerr niggerr nigger nigger niggerr niggerr nigger nigger niggerr niggerr nigger nigger niggerr niggerr nigger nigger niggerr niggerr nigger nigger niggerr niggerr nigger nigger niggerr niggerr nigger nigger niggerr nigger