Investing too much money into it, thinking some obviously natural things are caused by global warming/human activity when it's not, and yeah as you said banning cars

Just the extreme sides

I've heard a lot about global warming from both ends, some think it's being used to push for a political agenda, some think it's a waste of money, some think not all the money that is being invested into global warming is being put into good use, some think it's inevitable, some think it's inevitable but is influenced through human activity, some think it is somewhat influenced by human activity but the number is so small you can't really do much about it, some think it is 100% human activity (obviously not)

and tbh, I'm not really that invested into figuring it out. I just hear about it time to time

Also the global warming "pause" is definitely inflicting some doubts, plus some say there has been even warming on other planets that mankind hasn't even touched

I have a different stance:
-Global warming is inaccurate, I prefer "climate change"
-This climate change is actually extremely beneficial to humanity, look up the hyperbaric effect.
-most people who argue about are so hilariously clueless, including the "scientists"

Don't agree? Debate me in a couple hours (I'm going out) in text or voice tomorrow

I praise the apocalypse

Lets turn this planet into a giant oven

Lol

Lmfao

yas

That man was evil

depends on who you ask

or he was a socialist according to some autists

He was lmao

Hey do you guys get ppl on voice chat often or not?

Not

🤷🏻

Sieg heil

<:swastika:436842886349324309>

yas

Where did you get these statistics?

Tell me where you got them

from?

can't give a source huh

🤔

exactly

*facepalm*

Generally, mass unassimilated immigration into one's nation would cause a huge problem, as Europe is showing the entire globe

if its that common then shouldnt giving the link be as simple as it sounds

But it certainly isn't the root cause of their problems

exactly

Because you can't give us the source

because you'ré not giving the source when I ask you for it

I mean jfc

What?

That's a fucked comparison

@leftist npc man by that logic

you're saying that

Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia have way highest homicide rates in Europe after Russia and whitest demographics in Europe. Finland homicide rate in 2015 was 1.60, Sweden 1.15, Norway 0.56. Frances homicide rate in 2015 was 1.58 and USA 4.88. The highest homicide rates in Europe 2015 after Russia 11.31 are Lithuania 5.98, Ukraine 4.36 Latvia 4.11 Belarus 3.58 Estonia 3.20 and Moldova 3.19. Hungary quite close 2.07.Germany has also about 18% foreign-born population, 2015 homicide rate of 0.85. UK´s homicide rate 1.2

Lithuania has even higher homicide rate than the USA. Lithuania has about 100% white ethnicity. Sweden and Norway that has a smaller percentage of "white demographics, have about 18% immigrant population have lower homicide rates than Finland, Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia that have the "whitest demographics in Europe". Some "ethnic-nationalist" described Finland as a white-ethnic state. Still, Sweden has lower homicide rates, than Finland