Message from @hcaez

Discord ID: 555219691279351828


2019-03-12 23:34:27 UTC  

But look where that got us

2019-03-12 23:44:52 UTC  

Nobody stood out there though

2019-03-12 23:45:03 UTC  

And there was one lady Carly Fiorina

2019-03-12 23:45:19 UTC  

Now we have several women and several high status men

2019-03-12 23:45:28 UTC  

Plus Howard Schultz running would probably help

2019-03-12 23:46:35 UTC  

Schultz would severiously dent the political landscape

2019-03-12 23:47:41 UTC  

Do you think it would help GOP win or DEM?

2019-03-12 23:51:27 UTC  

It would definitely hurt the Dems but there’s a chance that if Trump makes a fool of himself that he could snag moderate Repubs too

2019-03-12 23:51:42 UTC  

The only problem is that everybody hates him 😂

2019-03-13 00:57:57 UTC  

Remember that time Congress had a televized lottery for the Vietnam draft?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418667927169138688/555192794033946625/kvimw0bcvo611.png

2019-03-13 01:02:45 UTC  

The US had a ~13% casualty rate.

2019-03-13 01:03:24 UTC  

Let's have a televized lottery for every Congressman's name. 11 names drawn to die, 60 to be wounded

2019-03-13 01:36:50 UTC  

How about no

2019-03-13 01:39:08 UTC  

y not

2019-03-13 01:47:34 UTC  

Congresspeople aren’t the cause of the problem, it’s the system and the people the system represents

2019-03-13 01:47:51 UTC  

(actually, some of it is the congresspeople)

2019-03-13 02:00:02 UTC  

Why not set an example?

2019-03-13 02:00:10 UTC  

Actions have consequences.

2019-03-13 02:44:13 UTC  

I personally believe congressional salaries should be lowered

2019-03-13 02:44:27 UTC  

170k base? endorsements? donations? books? it's too much

2019-03-13 02:44:49 UTC  

not to mention benefits and the fact that their staff are paid separately from their salary

2019-03-13 02:48:02 UTC  

^

2019-03-13 03:52:10 UTC  

Maybe, yeah, plus the whole election process takes an insane amount of time and money which makes them inefficient

2019-03-13 05:08:47 UTC  

Why not just abolish congress?

2019-03-13 05:19:07 UTC  

^

2019-03-13 05:19:12 UTC  

full autocrat

2019-03-13 06:20:55 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418667927169138688/555274074725810186/3rdchessgoy.jpg

2019-03-13 06:22:31 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418667927169138688/555274474728194048/407b6388326f78ecaa4e16c7487e5fd1da7a14a78eaea7034ddb1d6de5d864cb.jpg

2019-03-13 07:46:14 UTC  

@wahx mobility is irrelevant

2019-03-13 07:46:25 UTC  

There’s many other factors that determine this it’s not worth looking at

2019-03-13 07:46:30 UTC  

Such as intervention, mentality

2019-03-13 07:48:47 UTC  

In the us case I would say mentality and social factors

2019-03-13 10:13:24 UTC  

how is it calculated

2019-03-13 10:13:58 UTC  

wjat does it mean

2019-03-13 10:14:32 UTC  

intergeneration earnings are very elastic = bad ?

2019-03-13 10:17:33 UTC  

In a society with equal opportunity, a father's income would have no relation to that of his son (a correlation of 0). On the other hand, a country where jobs and income transition from one generation to the next would have a correlation of 1.

2019-03-13 10:18:02 UTC  

i think if it was 0 it would be bad, but if it's 1.0 it's also bad

2019-03-13 10:18:15 UTC  

probably being somewhere in the middle is good

2019-03-13 10:42:33 UTC  

you want to some degree have the success of the father to influence greater opportunities for the son, say, but you also want to give opportunities to other people

2019-03-13 10:42:49 UTC  

there's a balance between these two imo