full autocrat

@wahx mobility is irrelevant

There’s many other factors that determine this it’s not worth looking at

Such as intervention, mentality

In the us case I would say mentality and social factors

how is it calculated

wjat does it mean

intergeneration earnings are very elastic = bad ?

https://www.businessinsider.com/intergenerational-earnings-elasticity-2013-12

In a society with equal opportunity, a father's income would have no relation to that of his son (a correlation of 0). On the other hand, a country where jobs and income transition from one generation to the next would have a correlation of 1.

i think if it was 0 it would be bad, but if it's 1.0 it's also bad

probably being somewhere in the middle is good

you want to some degree have the success of the father to influence greater opportunities for the son, say, but you also want to give opportunities to other people

there's a balance between these two imo

at 0.0, intergenerational family business would cease to exist, and death/estate tax would be 100%, that is socialism

1.0 is obviously bad as well

I mean moving up classes here is irrelevant to the American dream

If almost every class can afford the dream

Then no point moving up

But what’s killed the American dream is socialism, the intervention by the state into the economy

The 2nd chart is economic freedom

@wahx @chad

?

Check above

The charts

lmao

YANGGANG

Lol

On r/feminism

They talked about how feminism needs socialism.

Is this Trump?

It's both

well it's missing the data for maryland because I physically saw trump here

do 90% of drugs come in through ports of entry

response: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXZ6W8jjL2k