Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

Discord ID: 553505731345645570


2019-03-08 09:11:55 UTC  

kill all legislatures

2019-03-08 09:12:03 UTC  

If we care about jobs being lost so much

2019-03-08 09:12:10 UTC  

I'm not. I never thought that was a good idea

2019-03-08 09:12:12 UTC  

Why don’t we revert back to the 19rh century jobs

2019-03-08 09:12:25 UTC  

We won’t grow then but atleast the jobs will remain

2019-03-08 09:12:31 UTC  

“Here’s an example. A Deloitte study of automation in the U.K. found that 800,000 low-skilled jobs were eliminated as the result of AI and other automation technologies. But get this: 3.5 million new jobs were created as well, and those jobs paid on average nearly $13,000 more per year than the ones that were lost”

2019-03-08 09:12:37 UTC  

It's a lie the government said. Wanting automation is what Washington wants

2019-03-08 09:12:56 UTC  

um...

2019-03-08 09:13:02 UTC  

Lol?

2019-03-08 09:13:15 UTC  

Like I said. It is absolutely great for the GDP

2019-03-08 09:13:18 UTC  

Automation has always resulted in more jobs

2019-03-08 09:13:29 UTC  

GDP isn’t what I’m referring to

2019-03-08 09:13:34 UTC  

Dude, do you think it will be better for people if people worked more?

2019-03-08 09:13:35 UTC  

It has not

2019-03-08 09:13:37 UTC  

Gdp isn’t even a good measure for the economic growth

2019-03-08 09:13:41 UTC  

GDP is bullshit

2019-03-08 09:13:49 UTC  

I agree with you

2019-03-08 09:13:53 UTC  

The fact that prices will fall and people’s material standard of living will rise

2019-03-08 09:13:54 UTC  

It is like measuring apples and tvs

2019-03-08 09:14:02 UTC  

GDP is simply spending

2019-03-08 09:14:09 UTC  

It may give some idea but

2019-03-08 09:14:13 UTC  

It *is* compering apples and tvs

2019-03-08 09:14:30 UTC  

And spending has nothing to do with material prospierty

2019-03-08 09:14:43 UTC  

Automation is really made worse by intervention

2019-03-08 09:15:02 UTC  

If Yang fries to stop it, companies will move countries and you have a bigger job loss

2019-03-08 09:15:06 UTC  

Tries*

2019-03-08 09:15:13 UTC  

I am saying... If it always created more jobs. why have half the 4 million jobs lost to automation in the midwest and 2 million of them have never worked again @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

2019-03-08 09:15:34 UTC  

please demonstrate that actually happened

2019-03-08 09:15:47 UTC  

And I repeat, do you think it would be better if people worked more?

2019-03-08 09:15:58 UTC  

Pep in I told you

2019-03-08 09:16:02 UTC  

Intervention and welfare

2019-03-08 09:16:11 UTC  

And that's not jobs

2019-03-08 09:16:31 UTC  

“Another factor is the growing trend of occupational licensing. Requiring licenses to become a pet-sitter or hair braider has made it more difficult for people to launch new careers.”

2019-03-08 09:16:36 UTC  

Welfare subsidies unproductive activities

2019-03-08 09:16:48 UTC  

And intervention just raises the cost of business and results in lower demand for workers

2019-03-08 09:16:50 UTC  

I'm not here to find sources for you @Kaladin maybe later sure ask me then

2019-03-08 09:17:02 UTC  

Things like a min wage is a good example of why automation is happening faster

2019-03-08 09:17:21 UTC  

Well, faster, but it would happen anyway

2019-03-08 09:17:25 UTC  

and that's a good thing

2019-03-08 09:18:04 UTC  

Yeah and it would not be so exacerbated

2019-03-08 09:18:25 UTC  

Humans won’t be fully replaced, ever