Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
Discord ID: 553505597136306177
I'll repeat a statement from above
How on earth will that help
I remember the idea in Washington is that they will all become computer programmers and so everything would be fine. But it didn't happen.
I mean, it worked in the 30's, it will work now
Pep in it mostly has but there are few problems that can be solved if there was not as much intervention
Washington has many bad ideas, don't use them as the measurement
kill all legislatures
If we care about jobs being lost so much
I'm not. I never thought that was a good idea
Why don’t we revert back to the 19rh century jobs
We won’t grow then but atleast the jobs will remain
“Here’s an example. A Deloitte study of automation in the U.K. found that 800,000 low-skilled jobs were eliminated as the result of AI and other automation technologies. But get this: 3.5 million new jobs were created as well, and those jobs paid on average nearly $13,000 more per year than the ones that were lost”
It's a lie the government said. Wanting automation is what Washington wants
um...
Lol?
Like I said. It is absolutely great for the GDP
Automation has always resulted in more jobs
GDP isn’t what I’m referring to
Dude, do you think it will be better for people if people worked more?
It has not
GDP is bullshit
I agree with you
The fact that prices will fall and people’s material standard of living will rise
It is like measuring apples and tvs
GDP is simply spending
It may give some idea but
It *is* compering apples and tvs
And spending has nothing to do with material prospierty
Automation is really made worse by intervention
If Yang fries to stop it, companies will move countries and you have a bigger job loss
Tries*
I am saying... If it always created more jobs. why have half the 4 million jobs lost to automation in the midwest and 2 million of them have never worked again @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
please demonstrate that actually happened
And I repeat, do you think it would be better if people worked more?
Pep in I told you
Intervention and welfare
And that's not jobs
“Another factor is the growing trend of occupational licensing. Requiring licenses to become a pet-sitter or hair braider has made it more difficult for people to launch new careers.”
Welfare subsidies unproductive activities
And intervention just raises the cost of business and results in lower demand for workers