I never made any claim as to credentials.

Because this is conspiracy corner, not "oh lets CHALLENGE a LIE that the LIZARD PEOPLE PROPEL"

Because this is conspiracy corner, not "oh lets CHALLENGE a LIE that the LIZARD PEOPLE PROPEL"

Again, I never mentioned lizard people.

Because this is conspiracy corner, not "oh lets CHALLENGE a LIE that the LIZARD PEOPLE PROPEL"

This is for the uncertain, the unobtainable, potentially classified. Not "me thinks wurld = flat"

Because this is conspiracy corner, not "oh lets CHALLENGE a LIE that the LIZARD PEOPLE PROPEL"

So trolling is allowed on the forum @Willem Petzer

No, this isnt trolling. Show me pictures of flat earth.

Dont hide behind mods just because your views are being challenged.

Ok, segmented

Satellite images?

Have you even been outside the stratosphere?

Post ANY proof of your model.

ONE.

I guess it is true what they say "Winning an argument against someone smart is hard, but winning against someone ignorant is impossible" and clearly you arent a smart one, so that sorta narrows it down. Peace.

Who took the "photo" and wheres the EXIF data?

"Go look yourself"

http://www.fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=9bcbed8243d09f78c240d2ef5d0e3b7c23753953.41900

What now sparky? Clearly photoshopped.

Ok, go find the original image and source images

You posted it you moron the burden of proof is on you.

You brought up photoshop

You posted idiotic CGI as proof of your model. Idiot.

Using scientific method, it has to be replicable with the same source(s) and procedure

So, go and do that, "homo novus"

So where did you use the scientific model to prove your model, genius?

Where's your recorded experiment? Where's your data?

Hypothesis: if the world is round, then there must be documentation.
Abstract: i will be demonstrating the curvature of the earth through photographic expression
Procedure: i found this image from spacex website
Analysis: yep its round
Conclusion: with this, world is round

@4rvp How was the speed of the axial rotation of the earth measured Mr Low IQ?

Lab error: used too much of an obvious picture that displays the curvature

How about you tell me?

Because there is still axial rotation in your flat model, correct?

But regardless, youre a lost cause. Time to tune up your tinfoil hat and continually live under that guise without credentials

@4rvp So you can't even answerTHE MOST BASIC question about your model?

http://www.fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=0cf55743d2ef45e09e2974a82104ff87e4a2bdca.231606

There's some NASA busllshit for you.