Yeah but there are far better topics that does the same

@rob yeah been watching some of the vids every now and again.

@Deejay from Earth about the horizon - I think someone should build a 3d scale model in CAD or sketchup with correct relative distances, so that we can see if that is true or not

I think people keep on underestimating the curvature and relative sizes, for example, the atmosphere is just a thin little sliver on the surface of the earth

ja, something I've noticed is that whenever I ask questions the explaination is always some advanced engineering or science but I've worked at large companies and it's always a miracle everything is running at all. it's like the gyroscope discussion, the debunkers say that we use hardcore science to correct our tools but in reality we use the simplest stuff that works, which makes intuitive sense, because if it was really that tough society wouldn't operate.

cad model is a good idea

@Sheamus Wow well spoken and well understood. Absolutely correct - you need a base-line of truth from where you can deduce the rest of the puzzle. But your house must be built on a rock-solid foundation if you are going to do it that way (so to speak).

@Newscat ZA Check out Rob Durham on youtube, he's an AutoCAD God.

yeah when I have time ... like I said, you keep referring to to watch some long ass videos, this is just a ploy to waste ppls time methinks

@So if I don't feed you with a silver spoon it's not worth it?

did durham do a good scaled earth model?

its totally not worth it

I've put almost two years of research into it. Don't be lazy, you have to know it for yourself.

I was actually contemplating to create the different models in a game engine lol would be interesting

well then, since I've not seen any good proof of FE, I'm moving on 😄

@Newscat ZA Yes, not only that he modeled an eclipse on that globe in AutoCAD - and disproved NASA.

@Sheamus definitely !

@Newscat ZA 5 minutes of reading on the gyroscope discussion was enough to make me stop and think.

ok, then when I've time, I'll have a look

ok, name one point of the gyroscope

the things I've seen about gyroscope doesn't disprove sphere

the whole point of a gyro is that the level doesn't change

once rotating

you can test that at ground level, gravity doesn't influence it

I only do game development as a hobby, but could certainly try and do it lol, I'll see what i can put together as a fun experiment.

those gyroscopes autocorrect

which ones?

a spinning top?

@Sheamus yes do it! 😄

the aeroplane ones

that they always mention in this example

the ones they used in 1940?

those had to be corrected by pilot

@Sheamus Already done. Flat Earth - Heliocentric Model Examined Geometrically Part 1 - AutoCAD. https://youtu.be/yS_zF1V-pgE

they have to be reseated if they fall over

remember even radical aeroplane movement disrupts it

that is the reason for those 'autocorrecting' mechanisms

yup

@Newscat ZA Did you just say air"plane"? 😃

@Deejay from Earth yeah but can you put in VR goggles and fly around like superman? 🤔