Finish:

Now I ask again. Disprove the gravity law of newton and the relativity law of Einstein, show me a picture of the Antarctic wall and possibly what lays beyond, or what do you think lays beyond? Show me where your multiple luminaries come from (the one is from an Indian myth remember), what they look like and which laws govern their movement so that eclipses can be predicted as they are being predicted by the physics and astronomy you so whole heartedly try to discredit. My mathematics and science is solid, the laws work and I have not seen anything that shows or experimentally (accurately) tells me otherwise. I mean gravitational waves were recently detected after studying black holes, they were predicted by Einstein and Hawking’s works.

Im going to have some load shedding now XD lieflike Suid Afrika.😛

DeeJay met his match? lol

@Sidius Everything you said is irrelevant twaddle until you can prove the axial rotation of the earth, the curvature as per the chart, and Gravity. Feel free to post every single video you can find on YouTube that triggers your confirmation bias. I want experiments, not your opinion.

@Sidius Also it is impossible to disprove Flat Earth because mathematically it is impossible to prove a negative. You need to show the evidence FOR your model.

@Sidius At best you'll come up with ten or so, and each and every single one of them is debunked in this video. https://youtu.be/-Ax_YpQsy88

BA mathematical proofs

Beautiful maths

31.7 MILES of curvature drop-off over a short hop of 500 miles is how much curvature there is supposed to be.

But tbh sick of trig rn. Deriving the inverse trig functions is kanker

I don't care for maths. Who's going to argue with AutoCAD? 😉

Nobody

Cause AUTOCAD IS MATHS

And yet they do lol

schooled the flatters

Say what?

idk

Just typing random shit right lol

ah yes ok lol

Eric Dubay released the first ever Flat Earth childrens book. Full Audiobook available for free here. https://youtu.be/X_J9ACk6WP4

kanker

There is no verifiable rocket/shuttle launch that shows the view from the rocket that points into space. They always point down to the ground. Also there exists no uninterrupted nose-cam footage from launch to magically popping through an invisible barrier and docking at the ISS.

Other than than, Eratosthenes's original work doesn't exist and is nothing but hearsay. On top of that, the experiment is bunk because they assumed the sun was large and far away - where as if you assume the sun is small and close, you get the same result. Moot point really. -----------------------------------------------------------------

PROOF of gravity? What happens if you flip this table over?

The reason the establishment claim the earth is tilted is to try and explain away the scientifically verifyable fact that Polaris, the north star, has been seen from as as far south as 23.4 degrees - which is literally impossible on a ball.

Regardless of tilt or inclination, the ball model can not demonstrate seasons. It doesn't work.

Please show me your experiment where you heat Iron to five-thousand degrees and make it spin at one thousand six hundred kilometers per hour. Then prove that it is still magnetic by showing how your glowing spinning iron ball attracts a dead rat from across the room.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

None of the "Laws" you refer to has actually been proven, it's all philosophical assumption-laden garbage and bears no relation to reality whatsoever. On top of that, none of Einstein's theories have ever been proven and he made no discoveries at all. The only thing he invented is some type of refrigeration unit.

And congratulations to this poepol for proving that the pencil is denser than the air surrounding it. 😂

Ai nee wat... lyk my nie jy wil praat nie. Ek sal weer met jou praat as jy met iets konkreet na my toe kom soos ek na jou toe gekom het. Jou CAD tabel neem aan dis n soliede amper perfekte sfeer. En daai curvature sal dan gesien word. Maar die globe is nie perfek nie. Nie naastenby nie. En ek sal nooit daai curvature values van jou kan kry nie want jy neem nie my feite in ag vir jou tabel nie. Ook is daar steeds nie n muur nie. En jy kan steeds nie vir my wys dat 9.8 nie die gravitasie versnellings konstante is wat gravitasie kwantiseer nie. Gaan nie my kop try breek op die nie want daar is tog belangriker dinge waaroor ons kan praat?

Ai nee wat... lyk my nie jy wil praat nie.
Ek praat maar jy verstaan nie, ek kan nie met dit help nie ongelukkig.

Ek sal weer met jou praat as jy met iets konkreet na my toe kom soos ek na jou toe gekom het.
Soos wat? Een duisend youtube videos? Al wat jy hoef te doen om Rob se Gyro eksperiment te debunk is om die experiment te herhaal volgens die algemeen aanvaarde wetenskaplike metode en dan die teenoorgestelde resultaat te kry. Jy kan 'n DIRECTIONAL heading indicator koop op eBay.

Jou CAD tabel neem aan dis n soliede amper perfekte sfeer.
My CAD tabel neem niks aan nie, jy is die een wat aanneem dis 'n peer. Laat ek jou verduidelik hoekom voordat jy weer die hele youtube upload. Elke liewe "foto" wat NASA nog van die aarde geneem wys "fotografiese" bewys dat dit 'n ronde bal is (nasa of jpl.com - gaan kyky maar). Ook, dit moet 'n perfekte ronde bal wees want 'n odd-shape het nie vaste middelpunt waarom hy kan draai nie - hy gaan wobble. En tot jy actually die wobble kan bewys met wetenskap staan die aarde stil.

En daai curvature sal dan gesien word. Maar die globe is nie perfek nie. Nie naastenby nie. En ek sal nooit daai curvature values van jou kan kry nie want jy neem nie my feite in ag vir jou tabel nie.
"Sal dan gesien kan word" is net spekulasie en is geensins wetenskaplik nie. Jy het geen feite genoem wat enigsins die moeite werd is om in ag te neem nie. Al wat jy voorsien het is jou persoonlike opinie wat niks bewys nie.

Ook is daar steeds nie n muur nie.
Ook is daar geen bewys van jou model nie, terwyl ek jou meer as twee honderd van my model gegee het.

En jy kan steeds nie vir my wys dat 9.8 nie die gravitasie versnellings konstante is wat gravitasie kwantiseer nie.
Gravitasie is 'n fantasie en jy kan dit nie eers bewys nie. Nie eers met jou eie wetenskaplike metode nie. Die enigste plek waar Gravitasie en Relatiwiteit bestaan is in jou verbeelding.

Gaan nie my kop try breek op die nie want daar is tog belangriker dinge waaroor ons kan praat?
Ja ons kan gesels oor hoekom glo jy die teenoorgestelde van wat jy met wetenskap , jou eie sintuie, winskunde, ervaring, Logika en common sense kan bewys?