Message from @Deejay from Earth
Discord ID: 477090227840614400
I believe the light comes in from the top of the cloud and scatters , which then reflects on the bottom layer which is slightly denser.
I can follow that logic. But a cloud is the same thing as fog on the road and a cars headlights shining on/in it cant penetrate through it very far as it is water vapor and water droplets scatter light in random directions due to their shape and voids between particles which is the reason it interacts differently than light through pure water. So I dont agree fully.
Yeah there's so much left to re-discover here for the scientifically-minded. The whole thing is nothing short of magic. Personally I don't sweat the nitty gritty details too much, I am more interested in what it's for and what makes it tick.
Nikola tesla Why did Tesla say that 3,6,9 was the key to the universe?
Not one North / South circumnavigation. Because no-can-do on Flat Earth.
When you ask Hilter if the earth is flat
lol good one
@MR VLAK Please refer me to where the journeys are officially recorded by the governing body of the sport.
Yeah those comments are funny. Its like moths to a flame, they cant help themselves.
I do not understand why a expedition will be documented by a governing body of sport? http://www.southpolestation.com/trivia/history/transglobe.html
book a cruise or flight and go check it out https://www.polarcruises.com/antarctica/ships
That's how you circumnavigate flat earth. which consists of 70% flat water.
How far does the FE model say it would be?
from what i find (http://rickpotvinflatearth.blogspot.com/2015/05/aerial-circumnavigation-of-antarctica.html) 60000 miles
Rick Potvin is cool, haven't been on his site in ages.
42) In the ball-Earth model Antarctica is an ice continent which covers the bottom of the ball from 78 degrees South latitude to 90 and is therefore not more than 12,000 miles in circumference. Many early explorers including Captian Cook and James Clark Ross, however, in attempting Antarctic circumnavigation took 3 to 4 years and clocked 50-60,000 miles around. The British ship Challenger also made an indirect but complete circumnavigation of Antarctica traversing 69,000 miles. This is entirely inconsistent with the ball model.
okay but there are actually races doing this with records like i had shown, there are more than one such race. some form Oz, some from Europe.
@MR VLAK And kudo's for digging in and doing your own research dude. It's the only way you'll ever know.
a sail boat averges 6-8miles per hour, that speaks to the 16k miles form Albany around Antarctica and back taking 102 days. If would take a sail boat 300 plus days if the size is more than 60k miles
@MR VLAK They say a lot, they can say they are sailing around a ball all they like, proving it is a completely different story. All their routes can be plotted on the FE map. I
the times woudl add up though
@MR VLAK Yes and they took 3-4 years. Documented.
would not
3-4 years is still 3-4x how long it will take in todays yachts so it doesn't really add any merit
69k miles @ 6mph = 11500hours, divided by 24hr a day = 479 days/ 365days =1.3 years
that's conservatively
vs 102 days on a GE
<:Hmm3:469473862619496449>
Good thing the stars have been the same year-on-year since the beginning of time. Otherwise nobody could possibly navigate by the stars if they kept changing all the time.
Yeah I am also glad the rotation of the earth and its axis as we move through the universe together with our solar system and adjacent systems is constant