Message from @MR VLAK
Discord ID: 477111613392945162
why at the same acceleration if the densities are different? you said objects sort themselves by density
Yes, they are sorting themselves because they are falling. When they reach the bottom they have sorted themselves. Your vacuum is not a perfect vacuum.
You need to meet people half way DeeJay, you cannot expect to make no effort on your part and others to come to your mindset.. You can be just as wrong as anyone else is about anything. If you can't accept that, why should anyone else?
You can only claim to be better than anyone else, but the universe is designed to restore balance, this is why we have a golden rule, it's universally observed to solve any problem you have to balance things out evenly. Your claim is measured by your actions. The only problem that exists is that you think you are better than others, and until you solve that problem, you won't understand why people have a lack of interest to take you seriously and continue to accept the globe model, but will merely entertain your audience to let you show everyone else yourself how you think you are better than the rest of us, and i assure you many of us find it humorous. You really ought to think about that.
You guys are just proving density.
no...
a vacuum increases the effect of your density theory
@Sheamus People can laugh all they want, it's just the mind trying to deal with the trauma. I don't think I'm better than others at all, I'm actually a pretty humble and quiet guy. How am I supposed to budge with proven science on my side? All I am being is factual and straight forward. The honest approach as opposed to the condescending one. Honestly who here actually watched the entire 200 proofs video?
@Deejay from Earth yes and they too haven proven science, rejecting and denying theirs is no different from them rejecting yours... This is why you need to reason, not dictate
@Sheamus Where is this "proven science" my good sir?
I tried, but I cannot get over the fact that most of those only work in a world without gravity which I unfortunately cannot accept does not exist.
How about now?
In general, a scientific law is the description of an observed phenomenon. It doesn't explain why the phenomenon exists or what causes it. The explanation of a phenomenon is called a scientific theory. It is a misconception that theories turn into laws with enough research
gravity does not rely on magnetism...
just btw
What is it called when a scientific theory is taught as a scientifically proven fact?
science
i want to get to the magnetic gravity story...
What is the difference between a theory and imagination?
A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested, in accordance with the scientific method, using a predefined protocol of observation and experiment.[1][2] Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and embody scientific knowledge
So when are you going to test it?
Its been tested, I have given you three videos with the same results (repeated).
anyhow I wan to come back to the FE understanding that gravity is magnetic
Where was the results of your videos published?
For peer-review?
you can go do the research about whom verified it or go to any high school in the world where they will show you experiments that do the same
lets get back to your magnetic gravity story... please
What experiment can I do at home to verify the results for myself?
You see, I keep posting proofs and you keep ignoring them at your own convenience.
Four conclusive experiments performed by the top scientists of their day proved that the Sun, Moon and stars revolve around us, and that Earth is the fixed, motionless centre of the universe.
The Michelson-Morley, Michelson-Gale, Airy's Failure and Sagnac experiments scientifically proved Geocentrism and nearly crushed the dying Heliocentric theory until Mr. Einstein came through with his Special Relativity mathematical denial of the proven Aether and philosophically (not scientifically) banished the Aether from study ever since.
These studies and peer reviewed experiments are never covered in any university courses. These conclusive peer-reviewed and repeated scientific results are nowhere debated or denied, merely suppressed and ignored. The fact of the matter is that Geocentrism has been conclusively proven for over a century.
In 1913 Sagnac conducted an experiment to test the speed and constancy of light and proved the existence of the Aether (Disproves relativity) Therefore, The Michelson-Morley experiment, conducted using an interferometer clearly demonstrated that the Earth was motionless. The Michelson-Gale experiment detected the Aether/Firmament passing over the surface of the motionless Earth. Airy's Failure, demonstrated that it is the stars moving relative to a stationary Earth, and not the fast orbiting Earth moving relative to comparatively stationary stars.
I ignore them like you ignore your misunderstanding of gravity
See I give you peer-review and you post youtube videos about density.
share the link then
not some extract from a theorist blog
They assume that the experiments have been correctly interpreted, and never go and look them up for themselves. The experiments say nothing about a flat Earth, and the original experimenters would be shocked to think that their work was being used in that way.
share the actual experiments and conclusions for us both to read
You have to go and verify if my peer reviewed articles are real. Your job now to go and look them up.
okay your job is to find out what gravity is then, we will come back later and chat
@MR VLAK Your words debunk or prove nothing.