Message from @MR VLAK

Discord ID: 477111613392945162


2018-08-09 13:33:13 UTC  

why at the same acceleration if the densities are different? you said objects sort themselves by density

2018-08-09 13:34:08 UTC  

Yes, they are sorting themselves because they are falling. When they reach the bottom they have sorted themselves. Your vacuum is not a perfect vacuum.

2018-08-09 13:34:37 UTC  

You need to meet people half way DeeJay, you cannot expect to make no effort on your part and others to come to your mindset.. You can be just as wrong as anyone else is about anything. If you can't accept that, why should anyone else?

You can only claim to be better than anyone else, but the universe is designed to restore balance, this is why we have a golden rule, it's universally observed to solve any problem you have to balance things out evenly. Your claim is measured by your actions. The only problem that exists is that you think you are better than others, and until you solve that problem, you won't understand why people have a lack of interest to take you seriously and continue to accept the globe model, but will merely entertain your audience to let you show everyone else yourself how you think you are better than the rest of us, and i assure you many of us find it humorous. You really ought to think about that.

2018-08-09 13:34:41 UTC  

You guys are just proving density.

2018-08-09 13:34:49 UTC  

no...

2018-08-09 13:38:19 UTC  

a vacuum increases the effect of your density theory

2018-08-09 13:42:38 UTC  

@Sheamus People can laugh all they want, it's just the mind trying to deal with the trauma. I don't think I'm better than others at all, I'm actually a pretty humble and quiet guy. How am I supposed to budge with proven science on my side? All I am being is factual and straight forward. The honest approach as opposed to the condescending one. Honestly who here actually watched the entire 200 proofs video?

2018-08-09 13:45:05 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/469490581899575297/477110072816828416/Theoretical.png

2018-08-09 13:45:05 UTC  

@Deejay from Earth yes and they too haven proven science, rejecting and denying theirs is no different from them rejecting yours... This is why you need to reason, not dictate

2018-08-09 13:45:45 UTC  

@Sheamus Where is this "proven science" my good sir?

2018-08-09 13:46:38 UTC  

I tried, but I cannot get over the fact that most of those only work in a world without gravity which I unfortunately cannot accept does not exist.

2018-08-09 13:46:58 UTC  

How about now?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/469490581899575297/477110547473760267/DDNT6e0XoAAxDEX.jpg_large.jpg

2018-08-09 13:47:13 UTC  

In general, a scientific law is the description of an observed phenomenon. It doesn't explain why the phenomenon exists or what causes it. The explanation of a phenomenon is called a scientific theory. It is a misconception that theories turn into laws with enough research

2018-08-09 13:47:45 UTC  

gravity does not rely on magnetism...

2018-08-09 13:47:50 UTC  

just btw

2018-08-09 13:47:55 UTC  

What is it called when a scientific theory is taught as a scientifically proven fact?

2018-08-09 13:48:13 UTC  

science

2018-08-09 13:49:29 UTC  

i want to get to the magnetic gravity story...

2018-08-09 13:49:47 UTC  

What is the difference between a theory and imagination?

2018-08-09 13:51:12 UTC  

A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested, in accordance with the scientific method, using a predefined protocol of observation and experiment.[1][2] Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and embody scientific knowledge

2018-08-09 13:51:36 UTC  

So when are you going to test it?

2018-08-09 13:52:24 UTC  

Its been tested, I have given you three videos with the same results (repeated).

2018-08-09 13:52:54 UTC  

anyhow I wan to come back to the FE understanding that gravity is magnetic

2018-08-09 13:53:02 UTC  

Where was the results of your videos published?

2018-08-09 13:53:16 UTC  

For peer-review?

2018-08-09 13:55:08 UTC  

you can go do the research about whom verified it or go to any high school in the world where they will show you experiments that do the same

2018-08-09 13:55:25 UTC  

lets get back to your magnetic gravity story... please

2018-08-09 13:55:34 UTC  

What experiment can I do at home to verify the results for myself?

2018-08-09 13:56:10 UTC  

You see, I keep posting proofs and you keep ignoring them at your own convenience.

2018-08-09 13:56:26 UTC  

Four conclusive experiments performed by the top scientists of their day proved that the Sun, Moon and stars revolve around us, and that Earth is the fixed, motionless centre of the universe.

The Michelson-Morley, Michelson-Gale, Airy's Failure and Sagnac experiments scientifically proved Geocentrism and nearly crushed the dying Heliocentric theory until Mr. Einstein came through with his Special Relativity mathematical denial of the proven Aether and philosophically (not scientifically) banished the Aether from study ever since.

These studies and peer reviewed experiments are never covered in any university courses. These conclusive peer-reviewed and repeated scientific results are nowhere debated or denied, merely suppressed and ignored. The fact of the matter is that Geocentrism has been conclusively proven for over a century.

In 1913 Sagnac conducted an experiment to test the speed and constancy of light and proved the existence of the Aether (Disproves relativity) Therefore, The Michelson-Morley experiment, conducted using an interferometer clearly demonstrated that the Earth was motionless. The Michelson-Gale experiment detected the Aether/Firmament passing over the surface of the motionless Earth. Airy's Failure, demonstrated that it is the stars moving relative to a stationary Earth, and not the fast orbiting Earth moving relative to comparatively stationary stars.

2018-08-09 13:58:19 UTC  

I ignore them like you ignore your misunderstanding of gravity

2018-08-09 13:58:21 UTC  

See I give you peer-review and you post youtube videos about density.

2018-08-09 13:58:57 UTC  

share the link then

2018-08-09 13:59:15 UTC  

not some extract from a theorist blog

2018-08-09 14:01:45 UTC  

They assume that the experiments have been correctly interpreted, and never go and look them up for themselves. The experiments say nothing about a flat Earth, and the original experimenters would be shocked to think that their work was being used in that way.

2018-08-09 14:02:12 UTC  

share the actual experiments and conclusions for us both to read

2018-08-09 14:02:35 UTC  

You have to go and verify if my peer reviewed articles are real. Your job now to go and look them up.

2018-08-09 14:03:04 UTC  

okay your job is to find out what gravity is then, we will come back later and chat

2018-08-09 14:03:36 UTC  

@MR VLAK Your words debunk or prove nothing.