its the cavendish experiment... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_Transactions_of_the_Royal_Society

Cavendish, H. 'Experiments to determine the Density of the Earth', Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, (part II) 88 p.469-526 (21 June 1798), reprinted in Cavendish 1798

No that is a book.

what peer review happened in 17th century lets be honest

How about the last 100 or so years ago? Repeated and published?

I don't think scientists spend much time on items they learn in school and can repeat anytime they have a ladder, some string, ruler and weights. But I am speculating here

Also your entire model is still based on the assumption that the earth rotates. That still hasen't changed, regardless of how many links you post. You are wasting time with BS Strawman arguments and vague irrelevant bullshit.

no my model is based on the fact that masses are pulled to each other, this explains gravity and why solar objects orbit. Then gravity explains how water can be around a sphere

Then demonstrate how gravity sticks around a ball WITH AN EXPERIMENT.

proving the earth moves is irrelevant to me in proving the earth is a sphere

Ah yes. Proving the base foundation which you need to make your model work is irrelevant. Right. Got that. Thanks.

If I can make a ball with a mass large enough i would show you. I need to break the earth gravitational force first to show you

Gravity does not require the earth to rotate... the experiment is no-rotating objects... get that, thanks

Don't forget to make it spin at Mach 1.3

Why doesn't the moon have little mini-moons orbiting it?

@MR VLAK What is the correct curvature formula I should use to calculate how much curvature there should be?

@MR VLAK Also how high do I have to be to see the curvature and what is the formula used to calculate it?

@MR VLAK How does a vacuum exist to a non-vacuum while still maintaining the properties of a vacuum?

@MR VLAK If an airplane pushes off the air to move forward, and a boat pushes off water, what does a rocket in space use?

And if you say Gravity one more time without proving it I'm done.

Nah dude I am done. For a man that started his conversations last night by saying you know the earth is flat and not moving based on your senses sure made me wonder about those senses when you said your use of drugs changed your way of thinking. Sure trust those senses hey... I proved my point a multitude of times already. Anyone that indulges you just needs to come read the last two days to save them a waste of time and effort. A man is but the product of his thoughts; what he thinks, he becomes. - Ghandi (I am sure you will like that one)

@MR VLAK Lame-ass cop-out.

Well, was good reading though, entertaining too lol

Never trust a man who doesn't trust his own senses. ~Deejay from Earth

I don't trust my senses, i know how prejudiced they are.

Not aimed at you lol

Still... It's relevant

But the honesty is refreshing.

I know. Like with that dolphin thing where adults see sex stuff and children see dolphins.

Can I just state openly that yes I have done lots of drugs, I enjoyed it and I regret none of it.

So have i, but there is a problem if your argument hinges on the experiences gained through these drugs, because the experiences are entirely subjective because it's local to your own biology, and has no bearing on the objectivity of reality around you. Hence bad idea to use that as a means to help your argument, it ends up hurting your argument even more.

I never even connected drugs and flat earth. I was talking about the spiritual things which is my main area of expertise if I can call it that.

And flat earth is 100% scientific. I never claimed the earth was flat because it's in the Bible either.

Yeah I'm just saying, because you are saying that you rely on your senses, and your senses are subjective, not objective. You cannot experience reality objectively without reasoning past your own subjectivity and prejudices, and if you can't agree on the golden rule, then you can't be objective, because you won't have any need to be objective, since your subjectivity is superior over another persons subjectivity. You really ought be more reasonable and less of a dictator, you don't fall far from the tree that the liberal commies are, they have the same problem with regards to subjectivity and objectivity.

So I have to be nice and answer every question politely, while the globers can skip over questions and generally dictate the debate because why? Moral higher ground? Go have a look back at the last two days' conversations if you think I'm making it up.

Nobody can answer my questions dude. That ends the debate in my favor right then and there surely? But no, they just go on and on and throw more strawmen at me. Pfft.

lol

Lol i have been following it, as i have been following every other. You don't seem to realize that you cannot convince anyone of anything if you don't find common ground, hence meet half way.

What i observe is that people try to entertain your ideas, they watch some of your vids and they even look up some of the content, they are meeting you half way, but you just don't meet them, you expect them to go all the way and abandon reasoning to follow what you dictate is fact and true by your own measure, not by the golden rule everyone tries to meet.

Love your neighbor as your own self, do unto others as you would them do to you. And this is the thing, you don't fulfill that commandment, because it requires you to meet half way. When you think and claim you are better than others because they don't agree with you.