2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit

and 3. do these masses rotate themselves on an axis for different "Faces"?

all im asking

prove those 3

Google it @Deejay from Earth

@Sheamus I never claimed superiority, it's my science that is superior to yours.

> my science

no wonder why its wrong

not even using proper science

<:4032952896889815341:469993851143061524>

just prove any 2 of the 3 and i'll walk away

@Deejay from Earth > @Everyone

clearly his superior science is used in every scientific organization

so well done

clearly with less flaws and more success that modern science

@Deejay from Earth but you did, if it wasn't such a schlep to scroll back on my phone, I'd show your own words proving this. From the day you refused to acknowledge the golden rule, i have not bothered to reason with you on anything, because you set the premise of a double standard. So i just watch and try steer the engagement instead.

yet cant prove how the sun-moon model would work on flat earth

hell, not even the sun model

@Sheamus i see a block incoming

because SOMETHING it casting a shit ton of light onto the earth for heat and vision

and is going around the sky

no way it rotates around the emptiness that is the nothingness of space

because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away

2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit

They say laughter is good for you.... this day started great!

3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"

2 of the 3

all i need

Maybe @Deejay from Earth is the centre axis

@MR VLAK that's okay, wouldn't be the first time I'm silenced with a metaphorical bullet to the back of my head lol

Hi @Guss

@Sheamus I don't care about your golden rule. I don't care about the intricacies of debating. If you had any proof this debate would not even exist. Your opinion of me is just that. Your opinion. Think of me whatever you want, what you can prove with science is all that matters. Why don't you just use the scientific method and make me go away forever?

<:rooikat:468405556831453184>

he typed all that much just to @ poor sheamus in his disinterest to debate with this boomer

instead of proving 2 of my 3 points wrong

If you're not in touch with Tao,
at least you can still have integrity.
If you don't have integrity,
there's always kindness.
If you don't have kindness,
there's always justice.
If you don't have justice,
all you have left is righteousness.

it still amazes me when I prove all his methods are flawed that he believes them to be true

because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away
2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit
3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"

That is ALL you have. Righteousness.

@Deejay from Earth just 2 of the 3

PLEASE