Message from @4rvp
Discord ID: 477402869797093378
PLEASE
because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away
2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit
3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"
@Deejay from Earth how can you say you don't care about the golden rule?
Since you preferTaoism, it states: Regard your neighbor’s gain as your gain, and your neighbor’s loss as your own loss.
That's from the Tai Shang Kan Yin P’ien.
Taoism is just beta buddhism
confucianism**
Cute. Why don't you just stick to proving the ball and stop talking about debating. I don't give a shit.
<:Roets:476433845558837257>
👀
👃🏿
<:Wrong:469473844126679051>
i wan to get that quote a moment ago about steering the discussion he posted..
@4rvp yeah and in Buddhism it's:
Hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful.
From the Udana-Varga 5,1
i go by a proper religion
scientology
And in Confucius:
Do not do to others what you would not like yourself. Then there will be no resentment against you, either in the family or in the state.
Analects 12:2
Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION' ~ @Deejay from Earth
because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away
2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit
3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"
@Deejay from Earth JUST 1
PLEASE
i did it
i found something he cant argue
@Deejay from Earth and the rule is not for debating per say, its for reasoning, which is at the centre of not just debating, but science as well. Any statement must hold the possibility of being fallible, if not... Then it's leaning more towards a delusion.
ok now hes avoiding the points
because he cant prove it
i did it
that invisible space between the sun and moon in the flat earth hypothesis
cant prove it
i did it
he is using his techniques he shared earlier
i thought i was gonna get him with the whole
how light acts
@Sheamus You can not think and reason critically or logically if your entire model is based on an unproven assumption. DUDE.
@Deejay from Earth but thats what youre doing
Note: "Remember these techniques are only effective if the forum participants DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM. Once they are aware of these techniques the operation can completely fail, and the forum can become uncontrolled. At this point other avenues must be considered such as initiating a false legal precidence to simply have the forum shut down and taken offline. This is not desirable as it then leaves the enforcement agencies unable to track the percentage of those in the population who always resist attempts for control against them. Many other techniques can be utilized and developed by the individual and as you develop further techniques of infiltration and control it is imperative to share then with HQ."
😝
An anonymous writer posted an important new report on disruption at Pastebin. It is in the style of a leaked law enforcement memo, although we cannot vouch for its authenticity as a document produced by a whistleblower.
@Deejay from Earth you keep justifying the inequity DeeJay, you only dig your own grave deeper doing this. Do you still not realize that you are having the opposite effect of what you intend to achieve? How many more times must you repeat this experiment, expecting a different result? If you aren't getting the predicted results, don't you think that your method is flawed?
@Sheamus Looooooooooool my method is flawed or there really is something seriously wrong with humanity like I've been saying all along?
@Sheamus But you keep on pointing that finger away from yourself my friend.