Message from @4rvp
Discord ID: 477402692851990528
it still amazes me when I prove all his methods are flawed that he believes them to be true
because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away
2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit
3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"
That is ALL you have. Righteousness.
@Deejay from Earth just 2 of the 3
PLEASE
because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away
2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit
3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"
@Deejay from Earth how can you say you don't care about the golden rule?
Since you preferTaoism, it states: Regard your neighbor’s gain as your gain, and your neighbor’s loss as your own loss.
That's from the Tai Shang Kan Yin P’ien.
Taoism is just beta buddhism
confucianism**
Cute. Why don't you just stick to proving the ball and stop talking about debating. I don't give a shit.
<:Roets:476433845558837257>
👀
👃🏿
<:Wrong:469473844126679051>
i wan to get that quote a moment ago about steering the discussion he posted..
@4rvp yeah and in Buddhism it's:
Hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful.
From the Udana-Varga 5,1
i go by a proper religion
scientology
And in Confucius:
Do not do to others what you would not like yourself. Then there will be no resentment against you, either in the family or in the state.
Analects 12:2
Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION' ~ @Deejay from Earth
because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away
2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit
3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"
PLEASE
i did it
i found something he cant argue
no way he can recover
@Deejay from Earth and the rule is not for debating per say, its for reasoning, which is at the centre of not just debating, but science as well. Any statement must hold the possibility of being fallible, if not... Then it's leaning more towards a delusion.
ok now hes avoiding the points
because he cant prove it
i did it
that invisible space between the sun and moon in the flat earth hypothesis
cant prove it
i did it
he is using his techniques he shared earlier
i thought i was gonna get him with the whole
how light acts
@Sheamus You can not think and reason critically or logically if your entire model is based on an unproven assumption. DUDE.
@Deejay from Earth but thats what youre doing
Note: "Remember these techniques are only effective if the forum participants DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM. Once they are aware of these techniques the operation can completely fail, and the forum can become uncontrolled. At this point other avenues must be considered such as initiating a false legal precidence to simply have the forum shut down and taken offline. This is not desirable as it then leaves the enforcement agencies unable to track the percentage of those in the population who always resist attempts for control against them. Many other techniques can be utilized and developed by the individual and as you develop further techniques of infiltration and control it is imperative to share then with HQ."
😝