instead of proving 2 of my 3 points wrong

If you're not in touch with Tao,
at least you can still have integrity.
If you don't have integrity,
there's always kindness.
If you don't have kindness,
there's always justice.
If you don't have justice,
all you have left is righteousness.

it still amazes me when I prove all his methods are flawed that he believes them to be true

because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away
2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit
3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"

That is ALL you have. Righteousness.

@Deejay from Earth just 2 of the 3

PLEASE

because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away
2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit
3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"

@Sheamus I dont get him.. Why attack you?

@Deejay from Earth how can you say you don't care about the golden rule?

Since you preferTaoism, it states: Regard your neighbor’s gain as your gain, and your neighbor’s loss as your own loss.

That's from the Tai Shang Kan Yin P’ien.

Taoism is just beta buddhism

confucianism**

Cute. Why don't you just stick to proving the ball and stop talking about debating. I don't give a shit.

<:Roets:476433845558837257>

👀
👃🏿
<:Wrong:469473844126679051>

i wan to get that quote a moment ago about steering the discussion he posted..

@4rvp yeah and in Buddhism it's:

Hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful. 
     
From the Udana-Varga 5,1

i go by a proper religion

scientology

And in Confucius:

Do not do to others what you would not like yourself. Then there will be no resentment against you, either in the family or in the state.

Analects 12:2

Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION' ~ @Deejay from Earth

because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away
2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit
3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"

@Deejay from Earth JUST 1

PLEASE

i did it

i found something he cant argue

no way he can recover

@Deejay from Earth and the rule is not for debating per say, its for reasoning, which is at the centre of not just debating, but science as well. Any statement must hold the possibility of being fallible, if not... Then it's leaning more towards a delusion.

ok now hes avoiding the points

because he cant prove it

i did it

that invisible space between the sun and moon in the flat earth hypothesis

cant prove it

i did it

he is using his techniques he shared earlier

i thought i was gonna get him with the whole

how light acts

@Sheamus You can not think and reason critically or logically if your entire model is based on an unproven assumption. DUDE.

https://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2012-10-28/cointelpro-techniques-dilution-misdirection-and-control-internet-forum

@Deejay from Earth but thats what youre doing