Basic k/r dynamics, if the quality of k-rearing drops, r-prodution outpaces the intelkectual market and takes the reigns

Africans will be half the global population by 2100

@Burnside It doesn't work like that.
R needs a leader and also dies out after successive generations if increasing neglect and degeneracy.

Africans can only survive as long as we keep them alive.

@Tee CA But if you blow up the oil wells then buy them you would be stopping them from genociding.

So then k-strat need not worry about being outpaced and solely focus on quality of their children

I'd gladly pay taxes to PP if their operations were in Africa @Burnside

K strat is ideal.

Approx. 4 high quality children, each has the same focusing on quality and it cascades.

@Chancellor >Obama keeps them alive >Trump get's rid of the means to keep them alive >Blacks end up dying off >Killary is elected in 2020 >Black resurgence >President X Is elected >Get's rid of the means to keep the black alive >Repeats again

Really you want dynamic rk, where you produce the most numerous effectual offspring and place the bet on the generational creep of singularitarian gains creating a geometric advantage

Break reliances, break the social welfare system.
Let darwin and Adam smith have their way.

They will cut down on fast breeding or they will drown like rats under the weight.

@Burnside You seem to be making up words at this point.

@Burnside Singularitarian?

Nah, i just said the same thing as you

Only my mouth is full of shit

"if you can't explain it to a 6 year old..."

It's a good thing to aim for.

@Burnside Eugenics are forbidden in the USA....................................... for now

@Chancellor I try explaining the geography of the civil war's in the middle east and he does not know what a middle east is

But Chancellor, you haven't been able to explain things to six year-olds since that last settlement.

Man. I've been there.
"So the core issue with socialism"
"What's socialism?"
"Well, in this context a system of replacing private with government owned things through democratic creep..."
"What's democratic"
"How old are you?"
"24"

Jej

@Chancellor Was that a real conversation?

Yes.

I believe it.

If you actually talk to people you'd be surprised how many know actually literally nothing.

When I was in middle school I had some idea of what socialism was

But this guy

"Well really the whole thing started with the roman empire..."
"What's the roman empire?"
"Uhh, you know Italy? No? Europe? No? Seriously?"
"Well, if you're gonna be like that..."

THIS

Hahaha

This is making me more angry than it should

"Well, the state of the church is pretty complicated, the divide between catholic and protestant?"
"What does that mean?"
"Wait, aren't your family irish?"
"What does that have to do with it."

>NOT KNOWING WHAT A FUCKING CATHOLIC IS

All of these people can vote.

This is seriously making me angry

Told my boss 'color me incredulous' one day about some stupid thing he was really happy about and said was good for business, next day he called me into his office to define it because he had to look it up and probably assumed i was just trying to sound like I'd hit a college reading level at third grade

>Incredulous

Hey Chancellor, that dude might be trolling

No, they're not.