Message from @Pepe the Impaler - DC Area
Discord ID: 304700970221174785
Agreed on most counts.
Though I think the best response to the guns Germs and steel question is in fact "who the fuck cares"
It's an incoherent question. We are coevolutionary with our environment
Asking "what if we were in a different one" is just like saying "well what f u were a black African"
Nonsense
But this is about conversions, not speaking to the choir.
The next speech should be essentially the same middle and end but the beginning should address a lot of these points that I'm bringing up in more detail.
I just want hate seminars fam
Throw up 6 million facts
Go down the list
Or like "common counterpoints" etc.
"But there's more genetic variation within the races!"
See: lewontin fallacy
I'm skeptical of the premise that facts are the best way to persuade
I am too, but there should be a mixture of some sort.
Depends on the audience tbh
Nah the inspirational speeches is a good tactic
But he's gotta mix in redpills, or at least not flub questions like the "facts" one
He thinks he's talking to an auditorium of his own people but he's not, many of these squares haven't even heard a hate fact in their life
1) bowling alone 2) heroin epidemic 3) tv is gay
I think that the studies showing that diversity leads to less social trust are pretty powerful.
Agreed. But individualists need to value Social trust as an abstract first
That's why Doolittle's work is important as much as I hate giving him credit
this timestamp in particular is important
tl;dr more intelligent people are better at running abstractions of themselves through simulated environments, such that their ideas can die instead of themselves.
less intelligent creatures are unable to reproduce themselves via abstraction, and must therefore create replications of themselves ( reproduction ) to run through the same simulations
not that it's a conscious effort obviously but this it's the biological-instictual manifestation
but this ties in with r / K selection, and though it doesn't form a necessary and sufficient clause, it at least suggests all r selected species / peoples cannot abstract -- and this is obviously borne out in most of the scientific studies of abstraction power vs. IQ vs. race
but I think it's interesting in that it provides a sort of causal explanation, which does away with a lot of the handwaving surrounding IQ vs. reproductive strategy and provides a solid explicit link
because otehrwise there's not really a reason per se why high IQ species can't also be r selected
Kind of interesting but r/K selection seems to be unsatisfactory for looking at human political beliefs anyway.
Fag
fag
lol what a nerd
THIS BPARD ISFOR EFFORT POSTS U FUCKING FAGS
FITE ME IRL
Holy shit ppl post here and don't use at-everyone