Message from @🅱arD

Discord ID: 283434690638249984


2017-02-21 03:02:31 UTC  

Read the previous responses, as well as the video. Context, platz.

2017-02-21 03:02:33 UTC  

When it comes to pedophilia, the only politically acceptable stance is full rejection

2017-02-21 03:02:41 UTC  

Everyone knows how this works

2017-02-21 03:02:43 UTC  

Thats what he said

2017-02-21 03:03:04 UTC  

He claims that the video misrepresented his position, and that he is fully against it.

2017-02-21 03:03:14 UTC  

glad milo apologized, he should've been more clear and not fucking around with that subject

2017-02-21 03:03:23 UTC  

We've never been politically correct.

2017-02-21 03:03:59 UTC  

The movement which has spawned this group is a rebellion against everything sensible, everything accepted with facts, with discussion and dissidence both sensible and not.

2017-02-21 03:04:07 UTC  

And Milo is the same.

2017-02-21 03:04:11 UTC  

Though this is another level.

2017-02-21 03:04:58 UTC  

Politically correct would be character assassination someone we don't like by claiming he said it was ok to do what many in our own movement have admitted to doing.

2017-02-21 03:05:09 UTC  

Its the SJWs who are doing this.

2017-02-21 03:05:11 UTC  

While it is a fine line he's traversed here, it's the media that's going to play this up. Think of who has to gain from this before making immediate conclusions. No one can be trusted.

2017-02-21 03:05:42 UTC  

There's ways he could turn this around, do keep in mind he is charismatic, smart and good at milking controversy.
And a student of Bannon, who's a master at this.

2017-02-21 03:05:51 UTC  

^

2017-02-21 03:06:18 UTC  

He uses the controversy to point out pedophilia in the left, publish his book.
And then write a second book decrying the pedophilic subculture in the LGBT and related communities, use this to decry the mainstream left.

2017-02-21 03:06:22 UTC  

That's what I'd do.

2017-02-21 03:07:06 UTC  

They have actually backed themselves into a corner here.

2017-02-21 03:07:08 UTC  

There's two motives here. Either it was an intentional controversy trap he set a year or so ago, or it's completely accidental banter. Either way, Milo is only going to get more recognition through this. And in his business, bad recognition is never bad.

2017-02-21 03:08:12 UTC  

The big question comes down to us though:
Do we defend or decry milo?

2017-02-21 03:08:16 UTC  

Because now they can't defend the "I'm a pedophile but not a monster" bullcrap anymore. Nor can they let off Lena dunham for playing with he baby sisters cunt

2017-02-21 03:08:34 UTC  

god thats true

2017-02-21 03:08:38 UTC  

fucking dunham

2017-02-21 03:08:39 UTC  

they'll keep defending it

2017-02-21 03:08:45 UTC  

they are always hypocritical

2017-02-21 03:08:58 UTC  

The question is not "we" chancellor.

2017-02-21 03:08:59 UTC  

Well yeah, but they will look even shittier. Redpill more normies

2017-02-21 03:09:04 UTC  

We're not a singular entity.

2017-02-21 03:09:12 UTC  

"If they didn't have double standards, the liberals would have no standards at all"

2017-02-21 03:09:19 UTC  

basically

2017-02-21 03:10:54 UTC  

This made me kek

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/276935978369810432/283435353686409226/wow.png

2017-02-21 03:11:30 UTC  

Armored skeptic's gf censored his channel's of posts containing candid.

2017-02-21 03:12:05 UTC  

Because free speech

2017-02-21 03:12:11 UTC  

or something

2017-02-21 03:12:32 UTC  

That's strange.

2017-02-21 03:12:41 UTC  

@Rasenemus Kek'd at George Bush is smarter than Trump

2017-02-21 03:12:44 UTC  

I can't really see Shoe do that.

2017-02-21 03:12:53 UTC  

She's pretty /ourgirl/.

2017-02-21 03:13:04 UTC  

she doesn't even consider herself conservative

2017-02-21 03:13:16 UTC  

Shoe is not /ourgirl/...

2017-02-21 03:13:28 UTC  

though that has nothing to do with free speech