Message from @Josh42A
Discord ID: 524300001535590400
Not really think about a war vs a battle you can lose a single point to a fallacy but your overall idea is not fallacious
They're using the literal definition of ad-hom
It does mean an insult, however, an insult does not become a fallacy until it is used as an argument
I can say Islam is dangerous, all Muslims are terrorists. I've committed a fallacy of composition but to say I'm completely wrong would be false
Calling someone retarded is not a fallacy
Exactly
Shapiro gets it
saying someone is wrong because he is a retard is fallacious tho
Yes
that's what I said initially my friend
But that's an insult not ad hom
go read again
I'm just pointing out that technically ad hom does mean insult, but that doesn't make it a fallacy right away
I dont like the way its defined
it gets misused a lot
An insult is not a fallacy
using it as a reason to dismiss someone, is
Fallacious
but im just going into semantics and getting this off topic
This isn't semantics though
yeah
Me and Irma argued about that for 2 hours last week
thought this was no autism channel
is it autistic for me to point that out?
I'm not autistic I've been tested
I'm retarded
I've had people try to claim I was wrong because if "your retarded your IQ is under 70 so you can't possibly understand this"
where do you stand politically?
Classical liberal
oh no
😏 that's what I like to see
If I tell people my politics and their like "oh me too" I leave I don't like echo chamers
I'm here to teach and learn not to be told I'm correct.
did u watch spencer vs sargon debate?
Yes
who do u think won that?
Clearly Sargon Spencer refused to refute half of sargons points
I couldnt sit through it
It was really bad
That whole debate