@𝕿𝖔𝖙𝖆𝖑𝖎𝖙𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆𝖓 𝕲𝖗𝖆𝖓𝖉𝖆𝖉𝖉𝖉𝖞 yes

for when the spergs crawl out at night and people want a serious channel to move in to

Well it will certainly help it the ad-hominens, shitpost and memeind during the discussion, but it would be better for the channel name to be: No Autism Discussion so people catch what's about faster

If you think Ad Hominem is bad, you’re a retard

*banned*

hello fellow autists

Ad hom is bad but most people don't know what that is

Everyone I meet on these lower discords think it means insults

you're wrong because you're a retard : adhom
you're a retard : not adhom

That's incorrect

It would be "you are wrong because you hold x belief"

that just points towards a bias

hardly constitutes as adhom

It's a type of bias

What you described is insults either way

hurr you're wrong because u read breitbart

Yep

There you go

some truth in there tho

breitbart is retarded

Can be

Not all logical fallacies are bad

Or wrong I should say

slippery slope can apply in a lot of cases

like the degeneration of the society

Depends on the level of correlation

If it's above a 50% correlation than yes

For example queer theroy causing pedophilia

it's not what I'm saying, I'm saying that typically the slippery slope already happened and that saying it won't happen because it's a logical falacy is a bit of a lie

Well yeah that's appeal to stone though

There is also a fallacy fallacy

some meta shit right here

Not really think about a war vs a battle you can lose a single point to a fallacy but your overall idea is not fallacious

They're using the literal definition of ad-hom

It does mean an insult, however, an insult does not become a fallacy until it is used as an argument

I can say Islam is dangerous, all Muslims are terrorists. I've committed a fallacy of composition but to say I'm completely wrong would be false

Calling someone retarded is not a fallacy

Exactly

Shapiro gets it

saying someone is wrong because he is a retard is fallacious tho

Yes