Message from @Josh42A
Discord ID: 524297659855667202
No autism?
Youβre asking for too much
What's the purpose of this channel @The Big Oof ? To debate people only with facts and logic and not weaponized autism?
Cringe and bluepilled
for when the spergs crawl out at night and people want a serious channel to move in to
Well it will certainly help it the ad-hominens, shitpost and memeind during the discussion, but it would be better for the channel name to be: No Autism Discussion so people catch what's about faster
If you think Ad Hominem is bad, youβre a retard
*banned*
hello fellow autists
Ad hom is bad but most people don't know what that is
Everyone I meet on these lower discords think it means insults
you're wrong because you're a retard : adhom
you're a retard : not adhom
That's incorrect
It would be "you are wrong because you hold x belief"
that just points towards a bias
hardly constitutes as adhom
It's a type of bias
What you described is insults either way
hurr you're wrong because u read breitbart
There you go
some truth in there tho
breitbart is retarded
Can be
Not all logical fallacies are bad
Or wrong I should say
slippery slope can apply in a lot of cases
like the degeneration of the society
Depends on the level of correlation
If it's above a 50% correlation than yes
For example queer theroy causing pedophilia
it's not what I'm saying, I'm saying that typically the slippery slope already happened and that saying it won't happen because it's a logical falacy is a bit of a lie
Well yeah that's appeal to stone though
There is also a fallacy fallacy
some meta shit right here
Not really think about a war vs a battle you can lose a single point to a fallacy but your overall idea is not fallacious
They're using the literal definition of ad-hom
It does mean an insult, however, an insult does not become a fallacy until it is used as an argument
I can say Islam is dangerous, all Muslims are terrorists. I've committed a fallacy of composition but to say I'm completely wrong would be false
Calling someone retarded is not a fallacy