I watched pieces of it

alright fair enough, not sure what answer I expected. I'd have to rewatch the debate if I wanted to continue discussing the finer points of the debate

Sargon and Richard both embarrassed themselves, but Sargon even more so

I think he held his own

I don't think so

I feel in that debate that Sargon got demolished

Richard Spencer is also a generally weak debater

For someone to lose to Richard Spencer

and it's the reason behind his autism continuing forward

it's pretty sad

spencer is not really a debater tho

SAD!

and u can see he wasn't debating, more like stating his reasons for his own views

^

Speaking of sad I've been watching gad saad recently

it's usually what the debates between liberals and the "alt-right" devolve into, just liberals asking for us to justify our views

Right because there is no justification for idenity politics

saad is a jew tho

I'm a jew

well even better reason not to listen to him

he's a secular jackass

I'm secular

Nice adhom though

entirely materialistic world view devoid of any other perspective

I was going to explain my self

why that is

you're quick to pull fallacies tho

That implies you must be a materialist or spiritual

I'm not a materialist nor am I spiritual

I honestly don't care if nothing but materialistic perception is going to come out of your mouth, because that's what modernity used to explain everything

the higher ideal was nothing but more of material

to a point where we created these highly advanced constructs to just to create more and more wealth

forsaking one self to its ties to the land and nature

My higher Ideal is a more stable comfortable humanity

I'm a humanist

comfort is one of those, the freedom to be lazy, idle

I disagree

My job can be made more comfortable without me being lazy

a smoother stone to come out, no rough edges that build character, smooth sailing

comfort doesnt mean without diffoculties

let me give you an example