Imperialist Theocratic Autocracy>Nat Socs

@Bird Wizard we already have

solar power <:30yoboomer:521380551316209668>

dyson sphere

my friend

we barely scratched the surface of the solar energy

It's highly harder, but the principles are the same.

@Bird Wizard my friend, we scratched the surface in taming the sun

but did nothing to taming the seas

oh but we have

seriously why hasnt anyone thought of using ocean currents for hydropower yet

we sail the seas constantly

what is a boat but a saddle and the sea your horse

Also it shouldn't be the whole world until way further on, tropical regions will make parts of the Imperium gay

we know more about whats beyond the cloud than whats beneath the light of the ocean

pressure

Use the US Fossil fuel supply and use the revenue from it to invest in renewable energy, with oil, natural gas and coal being backup

if this exists down there

what else could

To hold the Monopoly of force and serve those that uphold it

Well I can hold a lot of vacuum, how many bucketfuls of water can you hold?

we explore both, if we didn't u wouldn't have that image

we explored it

not tamed

Is that some kind of jellyfish or crustacean?

squid

bigfin squid

not tamed, the potential is there in both, why exlude one over the other

@Matty are you really black?

Out of curiosity

Two men are waiting in line for toilet paper. Hours go by and one declares, "I'm leaving! I'm going to go kill Gorbachev!"

Two more hours elapse and the man returns. His friend asks, "So? Did you kill him?"

"No. That line was even longer."

yea

Not ebin

The role of the state is to maintain the status quo, mainly through enforcing the law and providing all for all public goods and services that cannot adequately be met by private actor

@Bird Wizard I never said that this goal was moral or something. That is simply the way things are. Any state that survives is a state that is able to survive. If survival becomes a secondary feature, the state shall fall

u said primary

Let's imagine that a state's primary goal is combating poverty for example. If that's true then if the state ever arrives in a situation in which it may either collapse while combating poverty or survive by using funds that could've been used to combat poverty on maintenance, then the state shall choose collapse.

Ironically, having collapsed, the state shall now be unable to combat poverty. It is self-defeating for a state to put something over survival

There are times when people should view the state as a problem that needs to be brought to heel or destroyed, but if we're going to have a state it is perfectly logical for the state to place its survival first