Message from @πΏπππππππππππ π²πππππππππ
Discord ID: 523651922436161552
Itβs because of nominalism, there is no conception of a female βessenceβ or βformβ, women are merely a collection of traits, so you can become a woman by imitating a bunch of these traits
all the more reason to be apart of neo-platonist gang
No, Neoplatonism is gay too
They have a faulty conception of God
What about Zoroastrianism?
@FreshWholeMilk shut the fuck up liberal
you dare contradict augustine
Augustine introduced a lot of philosophical errors to the western outlook
if you want to talk about philisophical errors on outlook can we talk about the river of fire thing from the orthodoxes
The thing about the river of fire being the same as the river of life?
yes
Itβs not dogmatic that you have to believe that, but it makes a certain amount of sense
Why should animals have rights?
I know you should nt do nonsensical things on principle but I don't understand the argument from ppl on the right that animal testing expecially cosmetic testing on animals is inhumane
We should use sex offenders for that kind of testing
not joking
instead of animals
Because when they become intelligent and form a society, they won't start enslaving us humans
I advocate for human testing when they have done henious crimes
I mean you don't need to use animals for that when you have perverts that can just as easily fill the same purpose
Jokes aside, most people that say that says because they pity the animal, "think of their suffering"
Or also, in some cases, because they find them cute
The part that I find ppl on the right saying this bothers me
By right I mean JQ-woke right
Most of these people wouldn't mind a genocide on cockroaches, insects etc, even if they are a crucial part of the ecosystem, just because they're ugly and gross
Well, they can be JQ-Woke but not Animal-Woke
humans are biologically more empathetic towards animals than they are towards insects
interacting with a roach does not benefit us in any significant way than it would have a human being thousands of years ago domesticating wolves for hunting
insects are still animals, it would be better to say they are more empathetic to mammals
well technically insects are their own category and they are important to ecosystems
but i cant ever feel anything for a roach
but i would feel empathetic if i saw a dog being attacked on the street
I would say that some of the roles animals have in our societies is dictated by culture and it should stay that way... in other cases well.. needless suffering is just needless.
I'm just correcting you scientifically, insects are Arthropods and Arthropods are from the Kingdom Animalia in Biology
Don't really care much about animals, just feel they have a important role in the ecosystem and thus should be preserved, same as Plants, Fungi etc
So I would have a problem with people killing a dog but not really with people killing a pig but even with the pig I would say that it should still be put down without the needless suffering.
Yeah, animals have different roles based on culture too, killing a Cow in India would be blasphemy, but in most other regions a Cow is just Meat and Milk
yup
its intersting how cows became such a sacred thing in India
theyre such a good source of meat and milk
ive never bothered to read up on the history myself