Message from @CronoSaturn
Discord ID: 533884258423537674
so gonna tackle this bite by bite orwell, why would we see women rather than men as neccessarily the "breeding" gender?
when did women decide they needed rights?
well where the heck do you think babies come from?
penises?
lmfao
women dont need rights chief
takes two to tango
Collectively, never because they Men gave them the luxury of said rights
like you cant get two woman in a room and get a kid out of that
ik
but rights are not needed to make children
Feminist campaigns were an attempt to convince men of an egalitarian lifestyle
right but why make women the breeding class and not men?
you can technically have 1 man breed with multiple women but you cant just have 1 woman breed with multiple men and expect the same fertility rate. its more necessary to have more women than more men
because they bear the child
Physical strength and IQ distribution
you fuckwit
Pregnant women cannot fight wars
nor lead nations
Women are inherently average they are the ones vulnerable after copulating and are physically weaker by all means nature intends they be cared for in this vulnerable state
not as effectively as men
not nearly
If women were meant to be on top I'm very doubtful nature would make them so frail so vulnerable and so average intelligence wise
strength is not really a factor in modern society and women can aim a gun as well as a man can
lol
ok retard
Modernity is a human construct
uhh huh
@CrowGoCaw yes
evolution isnt a "meant" to thing crow
women are the ones who raise children while the men work
Sorry I believe in God so it is in my case
this has been the case for thousands of years
and for good reason
since the beginning of man actually
right but the underlying causes for it arnt neccessarily still in place
what do you mean
also going by your logic men are expendable
its the most natural "hierarchy" given to us by our biologies
They still are it's just those causes aren't as impactful due to the leverage of technology