"Prob of chi2 = .8877"

There is nothing special about granger causality versus other hypothesis tests in stata.

So what should I interpret these outputs to mean?

Reject H0, right?

@Nikephoros

So, I read your results as failure to reject

Ah so I was reading it backwards

Yes, I agree with that. I think you have to accept H0 with those numbers because it doesn't meet the confidence interval.

FAILYRE TI REJECT

!!!

As the autiste said, .02 < .95

Not accept!

Roight

Oh yea

It's been 10 years

Kek

I was interpreting it like a p-value

Which was my big mistake

Easy though. You got the hard work right

Just had to remember how to read

Thanks lads

Time to add more lag operators until this shit works

The Korean prof in the Towson economics dept knows his econometrics.

I think he has also taught that at UMD.

I wonder if it's the same prof I have

Dr. Kim?

Trying to get a full name for you

Hmmm doesn't appear to be at Towson anymore. Never mind.

@Nikephoros jeong-Joon Lee/JJ Lee

lol rly

Lmao it's real

wewewew

this timeline

Who here /wantstodie/

not me

where were you when sweden was kill

Kikes could publically dismember Trump while dancing around to Hava Magilla or whatever the fuck while stating that they're going to do the same to each and every one of them and boomers would clap.

angry reacts only