Message from Nikephoros in Vibrant Diversity #general
"Prob of chi2 = .8877"
There is nothing special about granger causality versus other hypothesis tests in stata.
So what should I interpret these outputs to mean?
Reject H0, right?
So, I read your results as failure to reject
Ah so I was reading it backwards
Yes, I agree with that. I think you have to accept H0 with those numbers because it doesn't meet the confidence interval.
FAILYRE TI REJECT
As the autiste said, .02 < .95
It's been 10 years
I was interpreting it like a p-value
Which was my big mistake
Easy though. You got the hard work right
Just had to remember how to read
Time to add more lag operators until this shit works
The Korean prof in the Towson economics dept knows his econometrics.
I think he has also taught that at UMD.
I wonder if it's the same prof I have
Trying to get a full name for you
Hmmm doesn't appear to be at Towson anymore. Never mind.
Lmao it's real
Who here /wantstodie/
where were you when sweden was kill
Kikes could publically dismember Trump while dancing around to Hava Magilla or whatever the fuck while stating that they're going to do the same to each and every one of them and boomers would clap.
angry reacts only