The answer is, presumably, yes.

@Nikephoros I wish I could offer help. I used STATA for econometrics as well, but that was nearly 10 years ago.

I did my econometrics project on whether baseball player salaries are representative of objective output.

@Nikephoros

Spoiler alert, they aren't unless you time shift the pay by like 2 years IIRC.

@Nikephoros is the > an operator or just an output format?

@Koba I really don't know why its formatted "Prob > F", I think it might refer to a critical value of some sort.

Maybe not

Because I read that as "probability of f = .8903"

"Prob of chi2 = .8877"

There is nothing special about granger causality versus other hypothesis tests in stata.

So what should I interpret these outputs to mean?

Reject H0, right?

@Nikephoros

So, I read your results as failure to reject

Ah so I was reading it backwards

Yes, I agree with that. I think you have to accept H0 with those numbers because it doesn't meet the confidence interval.

FAILYRE TI REJECT

!!!

As the autiste said, .02 < .95

Not accept!

Roight

Oh yea

It's been 10 years

Kek

I was interpreting it like a p-value

Which was my big mistake

Easy though. You got the hard work right

Just had to remember how to read

Thanks lads

Time to add more lag operators until this shit works

The Korean prof in the Towson economics dept knows his econometrics.

I think he has also taught that at UMD.

I wonder if it's the same prof I have

Dr. Kim?

Trying to get a full name for you

Hmmm doesn't appear to be at Towson anymore. Never mind.

@Nikephoros jeong-Joon Lee/JJ Lee

lol rly

Lmao it's real