Message from @AboveCosmic
Discord ID: 419909180565094421
Sessions and Trump are acting. Trump has a go at Session on Twitter to create the appearance of distance between the two. CNN roast Trump for his outbursts — again creating support for Sessions in public eye. Good for the plan. Good for justice!
@Eithwen I tend to agree . This seems to be Trump's MO. Sad how the MSM knee jerk ever time they never get they are being played.
CNN Anchor reports; hey we did it again. Watch our latest report on how we get played for pay.
After all; never let a good fake news report go to waste.
well yes; earliest Q posts describe how Trump played up the support for pal Putin
baiting the MSM who leapt on it and chewed mercilessly
in full public view; drool
@Lorraine360 links dont work
Oh My Gosh !!! The post about spelling and structure is very relatively to us Patriots on media platforms! We should miss spell important words extra. The algorithms will not pick them up if they are not spelled the same. YouTube, Twitter ect is not prepared for major miss spelling!
😎
Misss spell'n , not a problem
people have pulled hidden images out of q posts?
is this true?
yes
@AboveCosmic check out steg channel
thats what we been doing
i have been awasy
away
Sniper did you get the link you were asking for on Dtube for Dustin
If not I have it.
TY
Any time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtNhbvXGWmE Anti-school is on youtube
the vid on B. Fulford imo is worth viewing having followed him for over a year now, however
like many vids, this is a re-run. Benjamin has visibly aged since this and it shows how long these background out of sight shenanigans have been going on
This is displayed published Feb. 8, but it is circa 4-5 years old
I have an idea about reading Q. He asks "Why" questions that have substance and then follows them with a simple "Why?" Here is a possibility. We see something like, "Why is SR back in the news? Why?" My idea is that the second "Why?" is not merely a repeat emphasis on the previous question. It could be. My idea is that it the second, "Why?" is directed at the answer to the previous question. So, the template would look something like this. We read, "Why xzy? Why?" It's intended to be thought through like this--> Q: Why xyz? A: Xyz is happening so because of abc. Q: Why is abc happening?] (I wish we could make paragraphs in these posts.) If I'm correct, then this is to get us to think through things and their interconnections. I've noticed a striking lack of ability for people to think systematically. We've had 3 generations in the US of people shunning math and unable to understand their own first language. (It's not just grammar, but SYNTAX. Have you heard people say, "for all intensive purposes"? They're putting bad sound-alike words on a phrase they don't understand, "for all intents and purposes." This is done to sound forceful or intelligent, but shows you're an idiot when you mung it up. Another example is, "based off of," versus the logical & proper, "based on." You have a basis. Other things are ON that basis, not "off of" it.) Q started this by making declarations mixed with Socratic method teaching. He's likely doing the same thing now. Why A? Because of B. Ok, and why B?
Why is SR back in the news? Seth Rich has come up because the public needs to be reminded. Why? Because the public needs to understand the real evil of the people to be arrested when the time comes. Why? Because otherwise they will accuse the arrests of being merely political and unjustified. The public perception matters as much as the truth nowadays, a.k.a. "narrative."