So you're saying after Jews moved there those places became havens of left wing ideals? I wonder if there's any correlation there.

And because Jews were excluded from most of society until the mid 50's and 60's, they stuck together which is why they built each other up and became elites. Not because that there's some sort of conspiracy

@Benis yes because a few thousand people can influence the politics of places containing millions of people.

Full retard

Lrn2 history

@serv I do actually agree with that. That's actually pretty much the summary of Culture of Critique. I'm not saying Jews are acting irrationally, just that their interests are counter to mine.

And if you can argue with me, don't use gungrabber tier logic

Yes because Jews as a entire group share the same interests smh

Do you not think that groups of people can't have generally the same interests?

You going to tell me about the lizard people next

What kind of values do Jews generally hold on average?

We literally have the same values as every other American and if you spent any time around Jews you'd see that

Saying that the Jews were at the heart of the socialist movement doesn't make sense when we also consider that Jews were at the heart of the libertarian movement

Both those movements are materialist and centered around money. Neither of those economic platforms are beneficial for the average white family in America.

Libertarianism isn't centered around money at all it's centered around the freedom of people to do as they wish as long as they don't aggress on each other

Libertarianism is absolutely centered around money, it's an economic worldview more so than anything else. Just because Jews are involved in one political movement doesn't disprove their involvement in another. Neoliberalism vs neoconservatism is a perfect example of this.

In any case, the primary contribution of Jews to libertarianism is economic

URC don't know shit about libertarianism if you think it's an economic concept, Libertarians usually support Austrian economics which is its own thing, but there's nothing in libertarianism that says anything about money

Austrian economics are a core part of libertarianism, at least for right libertarians.

Which is almost always what people are referring to in the American discussion on the ideology

Right libertarian is a dumb term, there's 11 types of Libertarians

Because it's a broad philosophy, not a single thing

What’s the part with snakes and militias?

The only left libertarian movements in America haven't been relevant since the 1960's with the exception of anarchists.

tl;dr https://www.thoughtco.com/what-kind-of-libertarian-are-you-721655

and the long form version (52min) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37TGY8-LiHw

I'm very familiar with libertarianism as an ideology, I used to be one. It's generally very materialist and libertarian economics have been a disaster for America.

Yes because monetary policy has been so well, engineered inflation stealing our future

It's basically theft by Central Bank

https://fee.org/articles/inflation-is-theft/

Inflation isn't great, but interest is the real problem and actually constitutes theft. The abolition of a central bank isn't the answer and leads to the clusterfuck of the wildcat banking era. A much better alternative is nationalizing the central bank.

Yes I'm sure letting Congress Trump Obama and all the other idiots in government touch it will yield even better results /s

I don't think government is fundamentally a bad thing, the problem is who currently runs it. The current elite class is the problem. Strip them of power and influence and you could build a much better system. At least, under the government, the people know who actually has control over it. Private banks are accountable to no one.

Government itself is the problem, because people are inherently flawed.

only naive people think that it's a simple case of the right people not being in power

And governments are inherently always run and staffed by the elites

Government shouldn't be overbearing but it can do certain things better than private entities. Bureaucracy isn't always inefficient. There is always an elite class, even under a system with little government. Their existence isn't a problem, but the problem is how they use their power, which is overwhelmingly at the detriment of the backbone of the country. The throwing out of the current elite would fix the country, which would undo the sort of elite revolution of the 1960s.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-president-tom-fitton-to-testify-before-the-house-committee-on-oversight-and-government-reform-2/

clinton foundation pay to play bout to get the rekoning

@Sadmin who let this jew in?

shut up newfag