I don't get it?

it's a tire presure gage

his mom's a dumbass and thinks it's a drug thing

there we go

now the joke is killed

gj

Oh, that's stupid of her.

when the stupid person in a stupid person joke is so stupid you don't get it.

wrong one

@🅱arD That's where I was at.

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1970045_Sweden--Court-approves-marriage-of-pregnant-14yr-old-to-older-cousin-.html

"how did I know the couple's names weren't Sven and Lagertha? "

How have you fallen so much northern lion!

so any word on the website laddies?

the official site is already up fam

has been for a while

i love the christopher cantwell show

im defo not a racist but hes funny as shit

very talented writer

quick with the jokes

just saw someone mention him earlier

http://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1488219461469.webm

he takes in calls too thats the best part

one guy called in with a molyneux impression

one of the funniest things

@🅱arD Spooky

cantwell is still an-cap.. he has the flag on his set still and in the About section on his site it says he is an-cap

why is it that any time some libertarian embraces hoppean ideas that idiots say "he isn't an anarchist any more, he is super right wing"

they do the same thing to molyneux, even when he still says he is a voluntarist and that he isn't right wing

do people not have the mental capacity to realize that these things aren't mutually exclusive?

I dunno.
Anarchists are a very whiny lot, they tend to be ideology over pragmatics as an absolute rule.

doesn't really have anything to do with my complaint

Hoppe has been saying we need to remove undesirables from society for a long time (in a stateless society) on principal, this doesn't make him "right wing" or a statist

so now that molyneux and cantwell start saying things similar to hoppe, now they get called right wing and statist

Well, removing people involuntary kinda goes against voluntarism.
And while in order to assure a libertarian society it'd be a necessity, as I stated previously, anarchists are autistic and unwilling to compromise.

not against voluntarism if those people are a threat

which is not really my gripe

it's just that the purposeful mischaracterization of people's positions just to make themselves feel better about their own views, is retarded

it's time to stop.avi

Yes, but if we didn't strawman people we'd have to talk to them and end up having our fundamental views questioned.