@Arkator7 why you say that?

Congratulations, @Grimm0175 for reaching level 21!

#sarcasm

lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aMsi-A56ds

The graph look really good on paper...

💤 💤 💤 💤

@Arkator7 ikr...

Like all systems, you never consider the ideal state

you consider the average state

the ideal state is basicly an Utopia

and the worse case

wich is?

???

If the top boxes go corrupt

and why they go corrupt?

cos they do the least work and they want to keep it that way

and in wich system this happens?

how on earth do you amass $1.2B in gold?

with a massive group of people, starving?

exactly

The diagram also doesn't consider monetary flows

@Diablo i'll brb

but i would like to finish the debate

imma go grab a drink

When you consider monetary flows, it floats to the top

And stays there

Consider this; let’s stay you have 10 workers, producing 10 units each

That’s 100 units for the group

Under your paradigm, the group offers the 100 units to be distributed fairly

Now, the next entity up does logistics, which is a form of work, and takes a portion (say 2 units)

In the books, it still says 100 units, but you physically end up dealing with 98 units

That’s just ONE layer

Big entity, like governments, have many layers.

And departments which will form to monitor those layers

By the time you get to distribution, you’ll end up distributing around 70 units, whilst claiming to distribute 100 units

And that’s not even the worse scenario... that’s the average scenario