Message from @Vanguard
Discord ID: 309889556696530945
1433 = I love you too
Literally nobody says that Noah
I heard it
Where on earth did you come up with that?
had to look it up and double checked
it does in fact mean what I thought
I don't even know anything about 1433, i just came across this debate on the interwebz
Gay
youre in a sassy mood tonight nike
@here if you're online hop in voice chat
This is state funded BTW
We're going to guilt white people and punish everyone for not being "inclusive" enough. Somebody will be called a white supremacist. Tune in and cringe.
lol some literal fag from college is larping about how the democratic party will rise from the ashes like phoenix and burn the GOP
eh, after Bush, people thought we'd NEVER have a republican president again
I thought so too, then things took a YUGE turn
Wish I could stay up, I'm way too tired though
Good night y'all
G'night
g night m lady
Exactly, when the left has the power, they act in a way that pisses everybody off
now that the GOP is in power, they're going back to pretending to be "the resistance."
and their splintered interest groups fighting
and still pissing off normies
After watching the video above, i do think it is a mistake to argue about IQ, because it leaves so much wiggle room for disagreement.
we have yet to pin down ANY genes for IQ, even though twin studies show a dramatic genetic connection
and like a creationist, leftists can just argue that "all the facts aren't in"
It could be 50 years before we have a scientific understanding of IQ that leaves no room for doubt
Black "people"
http://i.imgur.com/R5s10wB.gifv
excited to see the muh evil alt right guy is in the show
Btw, the discussion the other day with Azzmador about how college blacks were claiming that the USA owes them for their contributions to the development of the early USA (arguing that slaves produced cotton for cheap, which allowed the USA to accumulate capital) reminded me another argument that I had with a liberal. In this argument, the liberal made the opposite point, that slavery PREVENTED the Romans from developing their own industrial revolution. This person tried to explain that this is why liberalism was necessary, because without liberalism, we'd be overreliant on slavery and wouldn't develop industrial machinery. SO which is it? Does slavery help or hinder industrial development? Also, once slavery ended in the USA, there was no long term crash resulting from the absence of slave produced cotton. IN fact, later 1800's growth was about what it had been during the first half of the century.
I don't think that the availability of slave labor has a dramatic effect on economic development one way or another, at least across a nation with a large population.