also sponsered by biggest hydrogen fuel makers

????????????????????

Yes, shell.

100% not paid to say these things

Shell has sponsored a lot of videos on renewable energy.

He is 100% sponsored to make these videos on renewable energy.

a thorium fusion reactor inside of your car is the future

I have seen no attempt to keep it secret.

full scale nuclear power plant in my phone when

lol

The thorium powered car is so retarded.

thorium good but in a car thats just fucking stupid

.drib, sponsored =/= wrong, shell are putting R&D into kite power, hydrogen, etc for very, very good reasons.

a macbook powered by sarin gas weapons

sorry i only came in here to trigger your autism

I'm fine with the message and all but when you make a video like that and sort of come of as preachy I don't like it

You haven't said anything that sounded serious, @deusvult, you'll have to try harder.

i’m an aussie shitposter

I'm Australian too, and this is low quality.

lol

Well, actually, it's decent shitposting.

It's just that shitposting doesn't piss off Australians, it's sort of like trying to kill a plant with its own poison.

Why not a liquid fluoride thorium reactor to generate the electricity for the charging ports for the cars? Only problem is that they'll start charging for the amount of battery you can get. It's gas stations all over again

Using nuclear reactors to generate grid electricity that then charges cars is hardly the same as mounting a nuclear reactor in a car.

Still though, why would you want a nuke in your car? Sure, thorium is safer to use, but still

You wouldn't.

Thorium powered cars are a retarded idea.

didn't ford once want to make a nuclear powered car

Then what's wrong with having a safe meltdown proof way of generating electricity for cars and such?

https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Ford_Nucleon

THEY DID

Yeah, that wasn't going to be a good idea @.drib

@Oliver Starley I don't know who here opposes thorium energy.

We would have been using it if Nixon didn't shut the research down

nuclear powered pinto when

Wanted it all focussed on stuff that could be used to make nukes.

Shit, why do we even have nukes? You would think that when chemical weapons were banned that they'd also ban nukes too. It's almost as if it was on purpose...

We have nukes because they are a very effective deterrent.

North Korea, which could not hope to defend itself in a real war, still exists.

Not for much longer if they agree to become one Korea again after the formally end the war

lol