Those fail.

Why shouldn't he have the same rights as the mother?

Because it's not his organs being used.

He did use his

Quite simple.

To produce sperm

He's the one that made those organs fucking work

And an erection

But I thought you loved rights.

Which he inserted into her body

With her (in this case) consent

oui oui

To fulfill his biological imperative

So, you do that, and you have the right to determine what happens to their body?

She then destroyed the cells and genetic information he produced and deposited inside her with her consent what right does she have once it is in there?

You do understand the importance of sperm right?

It's now not just her ovum or his sperm

But their zygote

You leave genes everywhere, do people have the right to wipe off your cum stains from their skin?

That's different. Come on.

MY GENES MY CHOICE

You made the argument

Organs are just the result of genes

Fucks sake

abortion should be illegal except for eugenics and mothers health

No I didn't. Shit you left somewhere is not your organs.

Yed

It's not shit

Neaksy nails how I feel

It is reproductive code

You are not abiding by your own argument.

Incest is that thing I want to say is included but the amount of fuckwits today that are into it would abuse that

it should be a medically backed reasoning behind the abortion (kid has the downs, autism etc)

Just like cum stains on someone's face.

It's the same stuff.

It really isn't.

Damnit you lost me

You seriously think it's the same?

THEY DESTROY YOUR GENETIC MATERIAL AGAINST YOUR WILL

Why kill someone because they have a mental condition

You don't have a right to other people's organs.