If you're going to fuck that up it's a burder you need to take

Well for me the father has no rights

If it came to it, I'd probably vote against it.

Oh definitely stricter

Twice as many, thrice as many.

He cannot save the child if he wants it

Misogynists

unless you were raped/assualted, or are under age 16 it's okay

That's a tricky one.

But is financially responsible if he didn't.

but otherwise

You brought it upon yourself

He does not have the right to determine who has use of her organs.

This is the cost of doing so

She allowed him to ejaculate in her with his

You knocked someone up so you have control of who gets to use their organs?

What a silly way to address it.

Could've used protection

She knows the result of sex.

there's a lot nowadays

Condoms, pills, injections, and this goes for both parties here.

So it's ok for you to get to determine who has use of her organs then?

Those fail.

Why shouldn't he have the same rights as the mother?

Because it's not his organs being used.

He did use his

Quite simple.

To produce sperm

He's the one that made those organs fucking work

And an erection

But I thought you loved rights.

Which he inserted into her body

With her (in this case) consent

oui oui

To fulfill his biological imperative

So, you do that, and you have the right to determine what happens to their body?

She then destroyed the cells and genetic information he produced and deposited inside her with her consent what right does she have once it is in there?

You do understand the importance of sperm right?

It's now not just her ovum or his sperm

But their zygote

You leave genes everywhere, do people have the right to wipe off your cum stains from their skin?