Message from @Nottheonlymoron

Discord ID: 392534953881239552


2017-12-19 04:31:19 UTC  

Children

2017-12-19 04:31:20 UTC  

Wheel spin

2017-12-19 04:31:21 UTC  

Are in fact

2017-12-19 04:31:23 UTC  

Even if you squirt in them.

2017-12-19 04:31:27 UTC  

Both father and mother dna

2017-12-19 04:31:47 UTC  

You seem to not understand this biology

2017-12-19 04:31:53 UTC  

lol

2017-12-19 04:32:01 UTC  

Neuroscience student here.

2017-12-19 04:32:09 UTC  

Sad.

2017-12-19 04:32:10 UTC  

As bad as it is, do we really want the kind of people who'd get abortion raising children

2017-12-19 04:32:24 UTC  

But why

2017-12-19 04:32:42 UTC  

Why not incentivise not having kids in the first place

2017-12-19 04:32:44 UTC  

I don't care if it's all the father's DNA by some kind of magic. My answer would be the same, you have the right to determine who uses your organs.

2017-12-19 04:32:54 UTC  

Or put a limit on kids

2017-12-19 04:33:11 UTC  

Something reasonable though not china's fucking bad shit

2017-12-19 04:33:15 UTC  

Like 4.

2017-12-19 04:33:15 UTC  

So you agree?

2017-12-19 04:33:24 UTC  

constantine fair point however even traditionalists are mixed on abortion

2017-12-19 04:33:31 UTC  

The average family is 1-3 kids

2017-12-19 04:33:33 UTC  

4th is pushing

2017-12-19 04:33:45 UTC  

It's reasonable but could curb it slightly

2017-12-19 04:34:09 UTC  

Call them babies instead of foetuses, the answer is the same. No matter how innocent someone is, they do not have the right to the use of someone else's organs.

2017-12-19 04:34:20 UTC  

But it should be as many as someone can afford.

2017-12-19 04:34:34 UTC  

That is such a ridiculous argument.

2017-12-19 04:34:42 UTC  

So neither the mother has that right then.

2017-12-19 04:34:47 UTC  

Which does not square with other things you have said.

2017-12-19 04:35:08 UTC  

Anyway good luck with your mong invasion

2017-12-19 04:35:16 UTC  

It squares just fine, having cum left in you is not continual use of someone else's organs.

2017-12-19 04:35:19 UTC  

Abortion is a bloody natural selection

2017-12-19 04:35:25 UTC  

The reason the organs happened was from the stimulus from the father

2017-12-19 04:35:36 UTC  

i do agree with the notion that the father should have a say because the baby has half of his dna however the cells multiply and the baby develops with the use of the mothers body so thats why it would ultimately be logical for her to have a say

2017-12-19 04:35:42 UTC  

The best natural selection would be if another bubonic happened.

2017-12-19 04:35:45 UTC  

No really.

2017-12-19 04:36:03 UTC  

But I will say no more on this. It's too controversial

2017-12-19 04:36:06 UTC  

Abortion is artificial not natural selection fwiw

2017-12-19 04:36:34 UTC  

define natural and artificial

2017-12-19 04:36:41 UTC  

It's removing your genes from the gene pool

2017-12-19 04:38:01 UTC  

But I'm done commenting on this. This is one of the few issues I dislike talking about.

2017-12-19 04:38:08 UTC  

The technical distinction between babies and foetuses is used by abortion advocates to pretend the right they are in favour of doesn't kill. I make no such pretension, the right results in the killing of the foetus, and there is no hard moral distinction whatever between a foetus and a baby.

2017-12-19 04:38:49 UTC  

The right for your organs to not be used by others against your will trumps that in my opinion.

2017-12-19 04:39:30 UTC  

I am perfectly willing for all that death to occur in order for that right to be preserved.