Message from @ebowden

Discord ID: 392558631054213121


2017-12-19 06:04:22 UTC  

Lives are valuable, but I don't value them to the extent that anyone has the right to the use of anyone else's organs without their consent.

2017-12-19 06:04:25 UTC  

You value the freedom of property over the absolute freedom of a life

2017-12-19 06:04:25 UTC  

I prioritise freedom of choice than freedom of responsability.

2017-12-19 06:04:41 UTC  

Property? No, freedom over your own body.

2017-12-19 06:04:49 UTC  

Which is your property

2017-12-19 06:04:59 UTC  

What about the fetus's freedom to use it's own body?

2017-12-19 06:05:15 UTC  

It's body is its property

2017-12-19 06:05:25 UTC  

And it can't survive without the woman.

2017-12-19 06:05:37 UTC  

You guys have any solutions to the problem of single mothers? I do let's first hear it!

2017-12-19 06:05:42 UTC  

but it is a human, thus it has rights to its own body

2017-12-19 06:05:58 UTC  

It’s ok to say you accept abortions is cases of rape or medical emergencies but I think it’s morally abhorred to say you support abortions for convenience

2017-12-19 06:06:13 UTC  

We simply disagree, you guys believe that you can have the right to the use of someone's organs without their consent, and I do not.

2017-12-19 06:06:30 UTC  

No, you idiots, solutions.

2017-12-19 06:06:34 UTC  

Ok. Theoretical time

2017-12-19 06:06:53 UTC  

@ebowden let’s say you have sex and you get pregnant

2017-12-19 06:07:01 UTC  

You believe that proposition, and I do not, there is nothing to discuss.

2017-12-19 06:07:06 UTC  

Did you know that there was a chance for you to get pregnant?

2017-12-19 06:07:37 UTC  

This logic can be applied to infecting people with STDs just as well.

2017-12-19 06:07:46 UTC  

No it cant

2017-12-19 06:07:49 UTC  

It can also be applied to a trip to a casino

2017-12-19 06:07:51 UTC  

Yes it can.

2017-12-19 06:07:57 UTC  

No it literally cant

2017-12-19 06:08:01 UTC  

STDs don’t have rights

2017-12-19 06:08:05 UTC  

They were aware there was a risk, yet did not consent to being infected.

2017-12-19 06:08:31 UTC  

Would you have unprotected sex if you knew it would result in a baby

2017-12-19 06:08:36 UTC  

That it has rights does not change whether or not you cosnented.

2017-12-19 06:08:49 UTC  

It is really that simple.

2017-12-19 06:08:57 UTC  

Consenting In unprotected sex = consenting to have a baby

2017-12-19 06:08:59 UTC  

You know what we shoul do? Ban welfare, support community charity, and incourage sex when married.

2017-12-19 06:09:02 UTC  

It’s really that simple

2017-12-19 06:09:13 UTC  

Unless you can't keep propositions straight in your head.

2017-12-19 06:09:39 UTC  

Sorry

2017-12-19 06:09:41 UTC  

No, it isn't. If that is true, then having unprotected sex is consenting to being POZed, and those cali nutters are right.

2017-12-19 06:10:01 UTC  

Consenting to unprotected sex = consenting to the possibility of conceiving a child

2017-12-19 06:10:18 UTC  

Now you are shifting the goalposts.

2017-12-19 06:10:26 UTC  

no u

2017-12-19 06:10:34 UTC  

I said sorry?

2017-12-19 06:10:41 UTC  

I literally just saw him shift the goalposts.

2017-12-19 06:10:42 UTC  

You are both faggots, none of you are giving solutions as to why it happens.

2017-12-19 06:10:48 UTC  

But 9/10 times a child is conceived?

2017-12-19 06:10:50 UTC  

Use protection.