Message from @Dinosorcerer
Discord ID: 406633970982191114
And if you're doing it by heredity, then it's a roll of the dice
Yeah you can get completely blasted out by a "good" ruler. Because the system, working as intended, means the average person's life must be nasty, brutish, and short.
Looks like someone found out that you can't call people Nazis on a whim.
I actually like Monarchy, as King Philip IV of France showed there was not much need for the title serf.
And @@AydinPaladin has said that she has read Democracy the god that failed so...
And tbf I haven't finished that one yet.
if Democracy is the god that failed, what does that make feudalism?
A greek style god that is brutal, uncaring, willing to harm others for it's own pleasure. But it didn't promise anything else. "I'm a god. I'm in charge. Don't question me. Now bend over and take it."
@Valet the Clown it is important to note, however that Phillip relied more on his civil servants than nobles or orders of knights. he even went so far as to disband the Knights Templar. in many ways he eschewed the feudal system.
That was my first point my dude @Dinosorcerer
There were no serfs but it certainly was still a Monarchy.
but that's not necessarily feudalism then
It is a Monarchy.
you can't have feudalism without the system of feifdoms
they were advocating for feudalism not just monarchy
or at least they said feudalism
whether they actually know what that entails or they were just using it as synonymous with monarchy I can't say
I'll have to watch it.
I view Monarchy and Democracy as private property vs public property.
Aydin brings up a central monarch, but I don't think she talked about barons or other lords
so it could very well be that she's talking about just Monarchy. but even then that doesn't gel with the part in her vision where people exist in small communities of free people.
that's not how that works
There will ceartainly be people who'll be granted titles, but those can be taken away. And frankly the only thing in feudalism I don't like is the freedom of movement.
and with the way the US economy works, primarily with an abnormally mobile workforce, you just couldn't get that sort of system to work without collapsing our whole economic system and starting over from a primarily agriculture-based economy
>Implying if there were to be a new system the old one would stay as it is.
well I don't think they consciously realize the radical change that would have to happen by the way they were talking about it.
I think only the normies believe that it can be achieve without much trouble although it could be as they said "They are becoming further right wing"
They are still new to this.
Although @AydinPaladin I hope you stoped calling it Anarcho-monarchy. I swear to my finger.
The path from normie, to actual thinking human is a long one, frought with peril and dead ends.
Anarcho-Monarchy? fucking what?
also, I didn't even realize she was in this discord. some mod I am
"Anarcho-Monarchy" Lol so just a normal monarchy?
depending on your definition of what a "normal" monarchy is
The best goverment ever.
>Die of plauge
>Executed for 'witchcraft'
>Taxed to living in mud huts
>Not knowing we are taxed more today.
>Die bc an atom bomb.
>Die in the name of "Freedom"
>NSA watching you fap