Message from @jman

Discord ID: 495587780689264641


2018-09-29 13:16:09 UTC  

to set up K... hmmmm. Is that what you mean invoking Gina?

2018-09-29 13:16:42 UTC  

was thinking more, clowns bein clowns.

2018-09-29 13:21:34 UTC  

Right. Any way you skin it, it’s not normal or natural but the cia is the best in the world at this so I hope we have to trust Gina too.

2018-09-29 13:23:23 UTC  

If we trust Gina, I think Jeff Flake is royally screwed any way you look at it.

2018-09-29 13:25:03 UTC  

how so?

2018-09-29 13:25:21 UTC  

none of it makes any sense at all, really. I just want anything tangible.

2018-09-29 13:25:55 UTC  

it makes sense

2018-09-29 13:26:08 UTC  

her dad was CIA, so it's plausible

2018-09-29 13:26:09 UTC  

im fairly certain none of this investigation, or any of what flake did, would have happened unless POTUS wanted it to

2018-09-29 13:26:35 UTC  

why do you say that? how does POTUS control flake?

2018-09-29 13:27:01 UTC  

and if he did control flake, he would have just made him vote yes

2018-09-29 13:27:06 UTC  

it wasnt just flake. flake was just the story that gave them the excuse

2018-09-29 13:27:07 UTC  

Congratulations @jman, you're now level 2.

2018-09-29 13:27:10 UTC  

so that cant be right

2018-09-29 13:27:25 UTC  

well, thats what im saying

2018-09-29 13:27:38 UTC  

we don't know who the target, or what the purpose of any of this is

2018-09-29 13:27:49 UTC  

it makes sense from no traditional angles of analysis

2018-09-29 13:28:00 UTC  

we know that we need to confirm K

2018-09-29 13:28:14 UTC  

that is of paramount importance

2018-09-29 13:28:14 UTC  

Congratulations @RocketManNK, you're now level 1.

2018-09-29 13:28:54 UTC  

i dont know that. I dont like the guy. I dont think shit is happening before the mid-terms. If he's a portal to the cabal, or something, there are a lot of ways it doesnt need to go exactly as you're imagining it

2018-09-29 13:29:26 UTC  

flake is actually controlled by RR, not POTUS

2018-09-29 13:29:44 UTC  

Grassley had no reason to allow that request for an absurd, non existent, time limited FBI investigation, after what we saw

2018-09-29 13:29:47 UTC  

you saw the article i posted recently?

2018-09-29 13:30:01 UTC  

I say he wouldnt have, and the president wouldnt have ordered it if he didnt want to be asked to order it

2018-09-29 13:30:12 UTC  

i think thats all I know with any certainty

2018-09-29 13:30:13 UTC  

flake said he got the idea of demanding FBI investigation from rosenstein

2018-09-29 13:30:15 UTC  

he had no reason to

2018-09-29 13:30:54 UTC  

what article?

2018-09-29 13:31:39 UTC  

Rosenstein is obviously focused on delaying/stopping FISA declas

2018-09-29 13:31:51 UTC  

so he told flake to pull this stunt

2018-09-29 13:32:14 UTC  

RR+democrats convinced flake

2018-09-29 13:32:24 UTC  

and RR was talking to trump last week. Ok, but track with me here... Flake is flake. He's going to vote yes because he (presumably) has to. if he wanted to sabatage trump and Kav, he can just vote no. Hes lame duck

2018-09-29 13:32:37 UTC  

Grassley has literally nothing to gain by going along with it

2018-09-29 13:32:40 UTC  

and he did

2018-09-29 13:33:06 UTC  

thats not persuausive

2018-09-29 13:33:07 UTC  

neither does trump, but he went ahead and ordered it, with the limited scope (which, again, makes no sense)

2018-09-29 13:33:33 UTC  

Trump has no choice

2018-09-29 13:34:04 UTC  

The only one with the choice has no choice. I see.

2018-09-29 13:34:10 UTC  

Grassley and Trump and Mcconnell had to go along because flake can sink K just by himself