>well read

He's also bilingual, he is a greater threat than sargon.

>leftist

heh

kraut is a scary leftie
Ill admit I like him though despite disagreeing a lot, he did say muzzies prob need to die

I still don't see your point @Chancellor, explain please

One can be well read while also never facing reality. A smart person can still be wrong.

Kraut seems to be smart but he gets really autistic about anyone right of him.

Kraut is smart and wrong. He is ideologically dangerous if he ever gained power because he would enable bad things.
He would push a "compromise" that would never work to the forefront of the discussion and people would jump on it because people want to still act like their "left wing".

>"Almost always the books of scholars are somehow oppressive, oppressed: the "specialist" emerges somewhere—his zeal, his seriousness, his fury, his overestimation of the nook in which he sits and spins, his hunched back; every specialist has his hunched back. Every scholarly book also mirrors a soul that has become crooked; every craft makes crooked.…Nothing can be done about that. Let nobody suppose that one could possibly avoid such crippling by some artifice of education. On this earth one pays dearly for every kind of mastery.…For having a specialty one pays by also being the victim of this specialty. But you would have it otherwise—cheaper and fairer and above all more comfortable—isn't that right, my dear contemporaries. Well then, but in that case you also immediately get something else: instead of the craftsman and master, the "man of letters," the dexterous, "polydexterous" man of letters who, to be sure, lacks the hunched back—not counting the posture he assumes before you, being the salesman of the spirit and the "carrier" of culture—the man of letters who really is nothing but "represents" almost everything, playing and "substituting" for the expert, and taking it upon himself in all modesty to get himself paid, honored, and celebrated in place of the expert.

tldr im on a phone what

Thats what nietzsche says about "intellectuals"

nietzsche is a crock of self important shit

Like he seems to make a lot of arguments from facts but the reason he is arguing for what he argues for seems to be based off his own emotional reaction to political ideologies

I'm not saying Kraut is good, or right.
I am saying he could convince people of something if he took Sargon's position which would cause problems.

He's preddy gude tbh

Sargon is mediocre, Kraut is dangerous. And kraut would replace Sargon.

then let's not shill him here

ye

sarcuck that is

kraut would actually be competent

And Kraut takes a much harder stance against the right wing

ehhhh

Kraut isn't arrogant in a self sabotaging way.
Kraut has read deeply on intelligence operatives.
Kraut also has support in Germany.
Kraut is smarter and more eloquent than Sargon.

Sargon is annoying, Kraut could cause real damage.

the only good that would come of kraut ascending is he would rally more people anti islam

everything else?

j

f

c

Ehh, I don't support my enemies, period. That includes sarcuck

If a good alternative to Sargon arose I would champion them, but as it stands he's an acceptable mediocrity.

Sargon focuses just on the issues he sees with the left wing and then occasionally remembers he is supposed to hate Nazis, while Kraut is the kind of person who says "communists are bad and Islam is horible but Nazis are worse and the far right is all bad"

heh, so basically a cuckservative

Except he's openly liberal

No, Kraut is "alt left", similar to lefty pol.
Sargon is a "classical liberal".

And he is really good at presenting logical and factual arguments

hes a lolbertarian leftie basically

is sargon anti islam

yes

so like

a centrist