At first I was pretty neutral in the whole thing, and sargon really wasn't involved, but as the other """skeptics""" tried to cover things up and defend candid, and then sargon stuck his nose into it with the whole "infighting" nonsense, I started to see things more and more from HO's perspective.

It really seems like sargon wants to collectivize the "skeptics" into some sort of community with him at the head so they can fight the progressives.

Huh

yeah he totally does

which is fine but at that point you need a sort of "holding of standards" which they obviously broke with the candid shit

I was never 100% behind sargon in the first place (he's a liberal so...) but this behavior seems like an abandonment of the principles that he started his channel over.

I don't know about entirely but somewhat yeah

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6qPfIKrruU is one of the reasons I followed him.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C4ayEL3XAAUcZQw.jpg:large

I love that.

But milo doesn't want to be gay

Yes he does. He says that for him his sexuality is a choice.

So it would more be a scheduled session with Mike "Volts for Colts Pence

I think he's bullshitting to appeal to righties

Oh nvm he said the opposite

Hah

Oh he said he wasn't born gay but can't change now.

brb gotta bring wood in for my fire

iirc, didn't he say if there was a surefire way to go straight he either take it or seriously consider it?

He said that he would but he would wait a few years.

Get the last black dick out of his system

yeah he wants kids

but he wants them to be HIS kids

http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1486899054050.png

I hate the 3rd point because Liberals accuse conservative states of trying to do it to stop minorities from voting and then the supreme court gets to neuter their voter ID laws.

yeah

When in actual fact it usually IS about preventing voter fraud and budget.

yeah most niggers know how to get an id anyways

they need it for booze

kek.

gtg

peace

back

Also any comic and cartoons users here? I remember a old cartoon in my dream last night

besides thata, just waiting for Pepe

Any update about the website ? Haven't been on in awhile.

We got something from their site

They are back.
They start their sentence with, " indeed, we can understand the anger..." and the end with "... but there is no justification for violence ".
When the employee-E-s in fight destroy computer equipment in a sub-Prefecture, holding for a few hours their boss, tear a shirt, they are here.
When Capita-E-s of suburbs exceeded-E-s throwing projectiles on the cops, destroy the street furniture, garbage down or cars, they are here.
They are here because they know.
They know that " there is no justification for violence ". and in version the most hypocritical and / or paternalistic, they add: " it is a pity, because it serves a legitimate fight ".

But the rest of the time, they are never there. The violence of the rich, the violence of the state, the symbolic violence in the media, it's not their problem.
This one, they do not feel the need, by a tweet, a press release or a statement to bfm-TV, the convict. And they don't ask anyone, before allowing him to express themselves and consider it as an interlocutor "legitimate", of the convict.

Because they do not live, this violence. They don't suffer, on a daily basis, in their flesh. And most of all because they know, at the bottom of themselves, that it is thanks to this violence that they can continue to occupy positions of power, too small they are.
And then they ask for a " back to the order ". an " order " unfair, unequal, violent, racist, sexist, but who, from their point of view, it is preferable to " mess " that might undermine their positions.
So listen, and hear, you the specialist of the " true, but ", the " no " and the " condemnation of the violence ".
You have no legitimacy, you the follower of selective sorting, to ask you in arbiter of elegance and to distribute the good and the bad points, from the top of your pedestal of politician, columnist or "intellectual".